The Texas Legislature’s serious consideration of a law mandating take-back and recycling for all household batteries sends a signal to other states considering the same, an advocate for the bill says.
The Texas Legislature’s serious consideration of a law mandating take-back and recycling for all household batteries sends a signal to other states considering the same, an advocate for the bill says.
The 11th annual E-Scrap Conference — held this week in Orlando, Florida — concluded with a debate on the pros and cons of potential national legislation on electronics recycling.
Apple picks a fight with backers of device-repair legislation, and National Geographic digs into the recovery of rare earth metals.
Elected officials in Illinois are mulling an amendment to the state’s e-scrap legislation that would lead to higher manufacturer recycling goals and protections for local governments.
Introduced by Rep. Emily McAsey, a Democrat representing Illinois’ 85th District, the legislation picked up four chief co-sponsors in recent weeks following a reading in the Illinois House Environmental Committee.
“If some changes are not made, I’m concerned [some programs] will cease to be able to operate,” McAsey said during the meeting, according to the Joliet, Illinois-based Herald News. “There’s the possibility of widespread illegal dumping [of electronics].”
Rep. McAsey did not return a request for comment from E-Scrap News.
At its core, McAsey’s amendment would signal three significant changes to the state program currently in place. The first change would be to double the current manufacturer recycling requirement from 50 percent to 100 percent of what each company sells in the state. (Individual manufacturer goals are based on sales of electronics in the state “two years before the applicable year,” the law states.) In addition, the legislation would stiffen the penalty against OEMs failing to reach that 100 percent goal. The legislation also aims to ensure recycling firms and collectors don’t charge municipalities for collecting or taking material unless they offer specialized services, such as home pick-up.
Mark Denzler, vice president and chief operating officer of the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association (IMA), told E-Scrap News the group opposes the amendment but will engage in talks next year as part of a planned review of the program set forth by current legislation.
“The IMA opposes the current amendment that requires manufacturers to double their goals and significantly increase costs for the collection of e-waste,” Denzler said. “The original law was carefully negotiated and includes a mandatory review of the program in 2015. Our members are committed to sitting down with Rep. McAsey and local government officials to review the overall e-waste program with a goal of making it better for both manufacturers and consumers.”
One of the main challenges of the current legislative framework, proponents of the amendment say, is that manufacturer goals, at 50 percent, are too low and leave towns and cities with excess electronics to recycle. With CRT devices representing the vast majority of the end-of-life consumer electronics stream by weight in Illinois (and nationwide), that excess material is costly to process and responsibly recycle, causing municipalities to discontinue collection programs. Recycling firms, meanwhile, have begun to avoid the residential stream.
“We already have millions of people without service,” Marta Keane, a recycling specialist for Will County, told E-Scrap News. She said Will County’s recycling contractor, Vintage Tech, has continued to service the area despite no longer receiving manufacturer funding to do so, while numerous other counties, Keane noted, including DuPage County, are now without service. “Any day we could lose service,” Keane said.
A bill that had the potential to do away with North Carolina’s e-scrap program was revised before passing.
A bill that’s passed through North Carolina’s Senate would repeal the state’s electronics recycling program.
Want evidence of how difficult it is to craft effective statewide laws for the rapidly evolving e-scrap landscape? Just look to New Jersey and the collection quagmire that’s unfolded there.