Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    NJ’s PCR delay risks making its own excuse permanently true

    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Seized e-waste in SE Asia: return to sender

byDavid Daoud
March 19, 2026
in E-Scrap
Electronics scrap gathered for recycling.

KPixMining / Shutterstock

Thailand’s recent seizure of suspected illegal e-waste at Laem Chabang Port is the latest in a wave of enforcement actions across Southeast Asia that is reshaping how the region handles foreign electronic scrap, and raising the prospect that exporters face a National Sword-style closure of informal import channels. 

With Malaysia running parallel crackdowns and corruption probes at Port Klang and Indonesia still working to re-export hundreds of containers of U.S.-origin e-waste from Batam, the Thai case is shaping up as a critical test of how the Basel Convention’s return-to-sender provisions will be applied in practice. Thai officials say a major portion of the load, declared as metal scrap but found to contain significant volumes of end-of-life electronics, will be sent back to the United States.   

Thai customs and environmental authorities have described three main groups of containers opened during an inspection operation presented to the public on March 10. The first group consists of 12 containers holding about 284 tons of material, declared on customs documents as “scrap iron” originating from Haiti. Officials say those containers actually contained electronic scrap, including circuit boards, computer components and other e-waste that falls under Thailand’s import prohibitions. Two additional groups included four containers declared as “metal scraps” and “mixed metal” from the United States, reportedly destined for Japan and Hong Kong, and two containers declared as “aluminum scraps” from the United States and the Netherlands.

Authorities have indicated that the March 10 enforcement action is part of a broader crackdown. The operation follows a separate seizure of 21 containers in February, 12 of which were found to contain electronic waste. On March 10, officials physically opened and examined 18 containers in the three groups described above. Thai media report that the Customs Department is preparing legal action under Section 244 of the Customs Act 2017, which carries penalties of up to 10 years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to 500,000 baht, and that authorities will also impose a settlement fine equivalent to 20 percent of the declared value.  

Thai officials say the 12 containers declared as scrap iron from Haiti, and found to contain about 284 tons of e-scrap, will be returned to the United States. Thai authorities have stated that, in their view, the electronic waste in those containers originated in the U.S., even though the documentation listed Haiti as the origin. The discovery was reportedly made following a tip-off from the Basel Action Network (BAN), an environmental watchdog that monitors trafficking in hazardous goods in violation of the Basel Convention. Thai authorities have linked their decision to repatriate the waste to the Basel Convention’s provisions on illegal traffic, which assign responsibility to the state of export or origin to take back waste shipments that are misdeclared or moved without proper consent.

Thailand is a Party to the Basel Convention, having ratified it in March 2023, and officials have framed this case as an example of applying Basel’s “return to state of export” mechanism to e-waste that reaches Thai ports in violation of national rules. The United States has not ratified Basel, but the convention’s procedures still allow a party such as Thailand to insist that a shipment it deems illegal be repatriated to the identified state of export. Thai authorities have not, at this stage, publicly named the U.S. exporter or broker they believe is behind the Haiti-declared containers.

The enforcement action builds on several years of regulatory tightening that have progressively closed Thailand’s doors to imported electronic waste. The government first moved in September 2020 to prohibit imports of e-waste across 428 categories, then expanded that list to 463 items in June 2025, adding more types of end-of-life electronics and aligning tariff codes with the 2022 Harmonized System. Against that backdrop, the Laem Chabang case signals that shipping non-repairable electronics into Thailand under commodity scrap labels carries a growing risk that containers will be opened, reclassified as illegal traffic and ordered back to the sender.

Thailand’s action at Laem Chabang is not happening in isolation. Malaysia is running its own crackdown at Port Klang, where authorities have seized hundreds of tons of misdeclared e-waste in recent weeks while anti-corruption investigators have arrested senior officials at the Department of Environment over alleged facilitation of the trade. Indonesia, meanwhile, is still working to re-export 914 containers of U.S.-origin e-waste from Batam. 

These developments increasingly resemble the early stages of what China’s National Sword policy did to mixed recyclables in 2018: a region-wide closure of informal import channels that forces exporters to find compliant domestic outlets or face escalating legal and financial consequences.  

Tags: Electronics
TweetShare
David Daoud

David Daoud

David Daoud is a contributor to Resource Recycling and E-Scrap News, covering IT asset disposition, electronics recycling, and circular IT governance. He is the founder of and current Principal Analyst at Compliance Standards LLC, where he conducts independent research and advisory work on ITAD markets, sustainability and ESG compliance, data security, and lifecycle risk management. Daoud has analyzed enterprise IT trends since the late 1990s and was among the first analysts to examine ITAD as a distinct market segment during his time at IDC. He advises operators, OEMs, and investment teams on regulatory, technology, and market developments affecting the electronics lifecycle.

Related Posts

Cutting healthcare plastics could save $18B

Report provides path to reduce medical e-scrap

byPaul Lane
September 25, 2026

The European report found that circularity in medical devices is possible through several potential initiatives.

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

byPaul Lane
September 24, 2026

E-scrap among three focus areas for student-run, California-based environmental advocacy group.

E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

byDavid Daoud
September 24, 2026

Rare-earth recycling economics depend on several factors, and there is no single price or date that makes the process pencil...

Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

byDavid Daoud
September 21, 2026

Fires continue to be a major threat to the recycling industry, even as states explore new policy solutions.

America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

byDavid Daoud
September 18, 2026

As the US invests in critical-minerals capacity will facilities have enough material to process?

Google Pixel 6 phone

Google makes repairability part of design ethos

byBrian Clark Howard
September 16, 2026

The tech titan supports the right-to-repair movement in several key ways.

Load More
Next Post
Traceability tools add recycled material trust

Industry coalition seeks injunction against California's SB 343

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

September 23, 2026
Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

September 25, 2026
Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

September 17, 2026
Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

September 24, 2026

Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

September 21, 2026

SB 54 plan for cartons, film draws warning

September 15, 2026
Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for September 2026

August 31, 2026
Calif. Governor Gavin Newsom at podium.

Newsom signs battery EPR expansion, vetoes SB 54 fund bill

September 24, 2026
Bipartisan reps introduce bill on recycling claims

House passes bill to ease lithium-ion battery storage rules

September 24, 2026
US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

September 16, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.