The following is a roundup of the latest details from the Chinese government and other key stakeholders on China’s fast-evolving scrap import restrictions.
Total ban on the way: The Chinese government released a lengthy policy document identifying steps the country will take for environmental improvement in the coming years. The policy indicates China intends to completely ban all imports of recovered materials by 2020, according to an online translation of the document, which is available only in Chinese. This will be accompanied by boosting domestic collection and processing of Chinese-generated waste, the policy states.
Authorized receiving ports list: China’s customs department on June 27 announced it will restrict scrap material imports to a specified list of receiving ports. The restriction is set to take effect Jan. 1, 2019. According to an online translation of the document, more than two dozen ports will be authorized to bring in recyclables.
Backlogs from increased scrutiny: Robin Wiener, president of the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI), touched on a number of other important points during a China-focused webinar in late June.
For example, she noted the Chinese government is now exerting more direct control over inspections and imports. It is requiring China Certification and Inspection Group (CCIC) North America to conduct in-person inspections for all scrap cargo leaving U.S. and Mexican ports for China. CCIC’s approval is required for all scrap exports to China. Wiener noted there are only about 50 inspectors available across the country.
Wiener also said China moved its former General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) into the General Administration of Customs. And ISRI has heard rumors that customs leaders in Beijing are making its presence known at ports throughout the country, instead of relying on local inspectors.
Wiener referenced reports that officers at Chinese ports are unloading every container to inspect its cargo. “That’s also causing further backlogs,” she said.
Inspection allegation: New pre-shipment inspection requirements are taking hold in the U.S., and the agency responsible has been accused of overcharging clients for travel expenses. Under the new guidelines, China Certification and Inspection Group (CCIC) North America must be on-site at the exporting facility to inspect all loads of scrap material that are bound for China. ISRI recently informed members the group has received complaints that “inspectors may be collecting travel reimbursements for the same travel from multiple companies in the same region.” CCIC did not return requests for comment.
Trade war stifles talks: Wiener noted that the trade war between the U.S. and China has made ISRI’s communications with the Chinese government more difficult.
“I’m in China relatively frequently, and certainly in our last visit, which was the end of April, we didn’t get into any government offices,” she said. She attributed that to two reasons: Tension between the countries and the ongoing restructuring taking place in the Chinese government.
Hauler giant on China impact: In a recent webinar hosted by the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA), Waste Management’s federal affairs director, Susan Robinson, provided new figures quantifying China’s dramatic decline as an export destination.
In 2017, nearly a third of Waste Management’s fiber was exported to China. In the first quarter of 2018, that figure dropped to 5 percent. And in May 2018, Waste Management did not export any fiber to China, Robinson said.
“Quite frankly, where we are today is close to zero,” she said. “Very little material is flowing into China right now.”
Robinson elaborated on a variety of additional topics related to the market shift.
She said the blended value of a ton of recyclables at a single-stream MRF has dropped by almost 50 percent between 2017 and 2018, Robinson said, and that has created challenges everywhere. She said Waste Management is only receiving revenue for 35 percent of the material moving through its facilities. “How many production facilities can stay in business when they have to pay to move 65 percent of their end product they’re selling?” Robinson asked.
China quantifies import reduction: According to China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment, there was a 57 percent decline in scrap material imports during the first quarter of 2018 compared with the same period in 2017.
May brings substantial decline: Chinese buyers in May imported the least amount of recovered paper of any month this year. According to statistics from China’s General Administration of Customs (GAC), the country imported 860,000 metric tons of recovered paper in May. That was down substantially from previous months.
The drop-off corresponds with the month-long suspension of pre-shipment inspection provider China Certification and Inspection Group (CCIC) North America. Industry sources said this move by the Chinese government virtually ground U.S. scrap material shipments to China to a halt throughout May.
Scrap plastic imports remain extremely low, according to GAC data. Official figures claim China has imported fewer than 20,000 metric tons of scrap plastic this year. However, U.S. export figures state the U.S. alone has sent nearly 22,000 metric tons of scrap plastic to China this year.
Paper permits bounce back: After several rounds of Chinese import permits issuing low volumes for scrap paper importers, the latest permit list shows a marked increase. The Chinese government on July 2 issued permits allowing the import of 1.78 million metric tons of recovered paper.
Prior to the latest issuance, paper permits were falling. On May 15, Chinese officials approved 63,755 metric tons of paper imports. Two weeks later, new permits allowed 44,337 metric tons to be imported. In mid-June, for the first time this year, the government didn’t approve any scrap fiber tonnage for import.
The recent permit list also indicates the government continues to authorize paper imports for a select few major industry players. For example, Nine Dragons, the largest paper company in China, received 55 percent of the allocated tonnage.
Differentiating companies: Southeast Asian countries, most recently Thailand, are enacting restrictions or outright bans on scrap material imports. The countries have seen a drastic increase in the amount of material coming in this year due to China’s restrictions. But according to one expert, new Southeast Asian restrictions have been enacted not only because of the volume increase, but because of violations among recycling companies that recently set up shop.
“I think for Chinese recyclers, you have to distinguish between the local ones that were already in (Southeast Asia) for years, compared with the ones that newly arrived due to the National Sword,” said Steve Wong, chairman of Hong Kong plastics recycling company Fukutomi. Most of the Chinese companies that recently arrived from China due to the ban “are not complying with the regulators,” Wong added.
He stated the U.S. exporters sending material are not at fault, and that the importers using permits illegally are responsible for the new restrictions bubbling up in Southeast Asia.
Chinese producer acquisition: Fiber mills in China continue to look globally for investment opportunities, with an eye toward securing additional paper supply for their mills. A subsidiary of Shanying International, which is the third-largest paper producer in China according to Fisher International, has purchased a Dutch scrap paper and plastics broker.
Cycle Link International has purchased Porta Westfalica, Germany-based Waste Paper Trader. Cycle Link buys and ships recovered paper to Shanying mills in China.
“With the change in shareholder structure, the WPT, which primarily markets waste paper, is focusing more on the Asian market,” according to an online translation of a German press release.
The companies could not be reached for comment.
Photo credit: fuyu liu/Shutterstock
More stories about Asia
- Study: Urban circularity requires tailored solutions
- ISRI recap: Exporters continue to face uncertainty
- Brands make sustainability moves, but use more plastic
