Advertisement Header Ad
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18, 2025

    Industry announcements for the week of Dec. 15

    Certification scorecard for December 10, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 8

    Certification Scorecard for December 3, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 1

    News from Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Precision E-Cycle

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Plastipak and more

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Sortera Technologies and more

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18, 2025

    Industry announcements for the week of Dec. 15

    Certification scorecard for December 10, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 8

    Certification Scorecard for December 3, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 1

    News from Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Precision E-Cycle

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Plastipak and more

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Sortera Technologies and more

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Plastics

Waste Management builds trash-sorting MRF near Oakland

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
April 18, 2017
in Plastics
Share on XLinkedin

An operation in California estimated to cost more than $120 million will extract plastics and other recoverable material from municipal solid waste. But it’s not aimed at replacing curbside recycling collection.

“It does not replace, it does not promote, it is not an alternative to source separation,” Shawn Tackitt of Waste Management told the board of the Alameda County Waste Management Authority (WMA) at a hearing in February. “We’ve been very clear about that. Source separation is our priority.”

Dubbed the ‘O-MRF’

While a number of recent mixed-waste proposals strived to allow residents to put recyclables, organics and trash together in one receptacle at the curb, the Waste Management operation is being framed as a last defense to recover materials that were not properly diverted by residents in local programs.

The organics materials recovery facility, or “O-MRF” as it’s being called, is being built at the 53-acre Davis Street Transfer Station in San Leandro, Calif., a city adjacent to Oakland, Calif.

Waste Management, operator of the Davis Street Transfer Station, plans to begin operating the new equipment early next year. Waste Management, a publicly traded firm that is the largest U.S. recycling processor, is also planning composting and digesting facilities at the site.

According to project documents, the 62,000-square-foot sortation facility will be able to process 100 tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) per hour and will handle all 150,000 tons per year of MSW generated by Oakland.

It is projected to extract about 60,000 tons of organics and 31,000 tons of recyclables per year, which equates to diverting 61 percent of the garbage stream from landfill. Alameda County documents described the processing line as a “complex system of screens and optical sorting.”

Waste Management spokeswoman Karen Stern told Plastics Recycling Update the facility is working its way through the permitting phase and noted the company believes the operation will be the first of its kind in the country.

Stern said the company estimates the first two phases of project – the O-MRF and the adjacent composting facility – will cost more than $120 million. That figure takes into account equipment, property, labor, permitting and engineering costs, Stern said. The project is expected to be rolled out in three separate phases.

Waste Management has applied to the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority for the site, applying for a tax exemption on a portion of the project costs.

According to documents from state agency CalRecycle, the O-MRF is currently under construction and is anticipated to be fully operational by the first quarter of 2018.

Spurred by contract specifics

When the O-MRF went before the WMA Board in February for inclusion in regional waste management planning, officials were careful to draw distinctions between the Davis Street facility and other garbage-sorting plants that have attracted the ire of recycling advocates who feel that the strategy reduces the value of recyclable materials.

“The difference between this organics MRF and a ‘dirty MRF’ is that a dirty MRF replaces source separation services,” Debra Kaufman, senior program manager with Alameda County, said at the meeting. “This facility is intended to augment source-separated organics programs with source separation continuing to be a focus for outreach.”

The project was spurred by a recent contract between Oakland, the county’s largest city, and Waste Management, Kaufman said. Oakland has robust recycling programs, with mandatory recycling and source separation requirements for multi-family and commercial properties. Standard single-stream recyclable materials are collected weekly by California Waste Solutions, and Waste Management handles weekly trash and compost collection. But the city’s contract with Waste Management, enacted in 2015, requires further processing of trash before it goes to landfill in order to meet high diversion goals.

California has pushed for aggressive diversion targets in recent years, goals which have been tied to larger climate change issues. Metropolitan areas have often responded by boosting their own local diversion targets.

“Oakland’s intent was to get the highest possible diversion rates, and they felt they couldn’t entirely rely on customer participation to yield those very high diversion rates,” Kaufman said.

She added that Oakland will not allow multi-family properties to claim the new facility fulfills their obligation to provide recycling and organics collection service to their residents.

“These facilities that we’re talking about today will separate and process organics that remain in the trash that are not source separated because they’re not placed in the proper organics bin by customers,” Kaufman reiterated.

Will residents relax their efforts?

Tackitt, a regional Waste Management director of operations, said he’s been working on the project since 2008, He noted that if the goal really was to replace source separation, the facility would have to be at least 10 times bigger, and it’s not economically practical.

Still, a board member asked what would happen when the word gets out about the O-MRF among the public, noting that it could lead some residents to slack off in their recycling separation diligence. Tackitt said Waste Management has not heavily publicized the project for that reason, explaining the company views the facility as a municipal tool.

“We’ve been very private about it,” he said.

Depending on other municipalities’ interest, the O-MRF may expand up to a capacity of 300,000 tons per year, according to project documents.

After separation, the recovered organics will be moved to the composting and digesting facilities adjacent to the O-MRF. Recovered recyclables, including plastics, glass and metals, will be sent offsite to be recycled, according to project documents.

The composting facilities are planned to have a 1,000-ton-per-day capacity, and a maximum annual throughput of 205,000 tons. They are slated to begin operating in late 2018, according to the county’s waste management plan.

 

Plastics Recycling 2018

Tags: CaliforniaMRFs
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Sector holds wide gaps in environmental standards

Sector holds wide gaps in environmental standards

byDavid Daoud
November 19, 2025

A recent investigation by the Basel Action Network has renewed questions about environmental accountability throughout the electronics lifecycle.

Softness in bale pricing adds to hauler headwinds

Softness in bale pricing adds to hauler headwinds

byStefanie Valentic
November 18, 2025

The nation's largest waste haulers delivered strong third-quarter earnings and expanded EBITDA margins despite lower recycled commodity values.

Weak bale pricing compounds hauler headwinds

Weak bale pricing compounds hauler headwinds

byStefanie Valentic
November 18, 2025

The nation's largest waste haulers delivered strong third-quarter earnings and expanded EBITDA margins despite lower recycled commodity values.

CurbWaste targets growth amid multi-million funding round

CurbWaste targets growth amid multi-million funding round

byPaul Lane
November 3, 2025

An eight-figure investment will help a New York City waste management software company take the next steps toward its founder’s...

New MRF guide aims to boost infrastructure

byStefanie Valentic
October 21, 2025

Closed Loop Partners’ Center for the Circular Economy and American Beverage have published a best practices guide for MRFs in...

Federal Recycling expands Denver operations

byStefanie Valentic
October 7, 2025

Federal Recycling & Waste has moved its Denver MRF to a new location, bolstering capacity and its ability to process...

Load More
Next Post

PetroChem Wire: Recycled PET prices hold steady

More Posts

Policy Now | December 2025 – Year-end nears, policy talks continue

Policy Now | December 2025 – Year-end nears, policy talks continue

December 1, 2025
Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

December 2, 2025
EU auditors support incentives to keep recycling viable

EU auditors support incentives to keep recycling viable

December 2, 2025
Policy Now | November 2025 – Cities move forward on recycling policy as federal activity stalls

Top Resource Recycling stories from November 2025 

December 2, 2025
Women in Circularity: Shweta Srikanth

Women in Circularity: Shweta Srikanth

December 2, 2025
Beauty packaging NGO looks to expand

Beauty packaging NGO looks to expand

December 2, 2025
EU flag

Top Plastics Recycling Update stories from November 2025

December 2, 2025
Colorado

Colorado NGO, recycler partner on innovation

December 2, 2025
Analysis: Lenovo enters circular IT, ITAD territory

Analysis: Lenovo enters circular IT, ITAD territory

December 3, 2025
NYC Commercial Waste Zones

IWS acquires Filco to expand in NYC commercial waste zones

December 3, 2025
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.