Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Policy Now

CA mandates uniform food labels starting July 1

Stefanie ValenticbyStefanie Valentic
June 22, 2026
in Policy Now, Recycling
Towfiqu ahamed barbhuiya

The long-term outlook for used milk jugs contributed to KW Plastics’ move to add white recycled HDPE resin to its offerings. | Towfiqu Ahamed Barbhuiya / Shutterstock

A California law aimed at ending decades of consumer confusion over food date labels takes effect July 1, giving food manufacturers distributing packaged products in the state less than two weeks to comply.

AB 660, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September 2024, requires any manufacturer selling food in California to use standardized date labels and bans consumer-facing “sell by” dates entirely.

The July 1 deadline applies to products manufactured on or after that date. Products already on shelves before the cutoff are not subject to immediate removal.

Date label confusion is one of the most preventable drivers of food waste in the country. Americans discard an estimated $19.2 billion worth of edible food every year not because it’s gone bad, but because the labels on the package sent the wrong signal.

A “sell by” date, or a message to the retailer about proper shelf rotation, has long been misread by consumers as an expiration date. The result is perfectly good food poured down the drain or tossed in the trash.

California discards nearly 6 million tons of food each year, and confusion over date labels is a leading cause. 

Decomposing food in California’s landfills accounts for 41% of the state’s point-source methane emissions. The average American household spends an estimated $1,300 on food that is never eaten.

AB 660 was authored by Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin (D-Thousand Oaks) and co-sponsored by Californians Against Waste (CAW) and Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

Under the new law, manufacturers that choose to display a date on their packaging must use one of two approved phrases. “BEST if Used By” indicates peak freshness. “Use By” signals a safety threshold.

The “sell by” date, which communicates nothing to consumers about safety but has driven billions of dollars in premature food disposal, is prohibited from consumer-facing labels entirely. Coded sell-by dates for retailers are still allowed.

“Having to wonder whether our food is still good is an issue that we all have struggled with,” Irwin said in a statement. “Today’s signing of AB 660 is a monumental step to keep money in the pockets of consumers while helping the environment and the planet.”

The bill builds on California’s 2017 law, AB 954, which directed the state to promote voluntary adoption of the same two phrases, cementing the labeling verbiage as mandatory. Manufacturers that fail to comply face potential misdemeanor exposure under the California Retail Food Code.

ReFED estimates that standardizing date labels nationally could save consumers at least $1.3 billion annually and help retailers recover $253 million through better inventory management. The organization’s president, Dana Gunders, called AB 660 a watershed moment — not only for California, but also for the country.

“It will be the first law of its kind to end the ridiculous confusion that causes consumers to throw out almost $15 billion of perfectly good food nationwide,” Gunders said in a statement.

Tags: Legislation & EnforcementPolicy Now
TweetShare
Stefanie Valentic

Stefanie Valentic

Stefanie Valentic is an award-winning journalist who has covered the waste and recycling industry for more than five years. Throughout her career, she has led editorial teams and served as a keynote speaker, moderator and panelist at numerous trade shows and conferences.

Related Posts

From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

byPuneet Thadani
July 10, 2026

In this guest column, the founder of Ecolar Global says the growing use of recycled content without standardized documentation presents...

SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

byAntoinette Smith
July 7, 2026

While the state extended the incentive program, the status of a separate bill with similar goals is uncertain.

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

Load More
Next Post

Deals expand Paladin’s global ITAD network

More Posts

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

July 6, 2026
Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

July 7, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

July 6, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

July 6, 2026
SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

July 7, 2026
MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

July 3, 2026
ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

July 6, 2026
Auto Draft

Digital product passports offer gateway into secondary market

July 7, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.