Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Europe’s recyclers miss most of the critical materials

    Europe’s recyclers miss most of the critical materials

    Chemical recycling roundup: New plant, partnerships

    Polystyrene’s circular future is already taking shape

    IBM logo on building

    What IBM’s quantum foundry means for ITAD

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 25, 2026

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Underwater data centers drive shift in ITAD models

    EU recyclers make case for solvent-based methods

    The electronics recycling industry has a plastics problem

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Europe’s recyclers miss most of the critical materials

    Europe’s recyclers miss most of the critical materials

    Chemical recycling roundup: New plant, partnerships

    Polystyrene’s circular future is already taking shape

    IBM logo on building

    What IBM’s quantum foundry means for ITAD

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 25, 2026

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Underwater data centers drive shift in ITAD models

    EU recyclers make case for solvent-based methods

    The electronics recycling industry has a plastics problem

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

State looks to reduce e-scrap program revenues

byJared Paben
June 13, 2019
in E-Scrap
Laptops displayed at an electronics store.

California regulators plan to lower the fees consumers pay to fund electronics recycling. The issue? The state is accumulating too much money.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which oversees the oldest state e-scrap recycling program in the country, is proposing to lower the fees consumers pay when they buy new electronics.

The move is in response to e-scrap processors handling significantly lower weights of regulated material in recent years. As a result, CalRecycle is paying processors less money out of the state fund, and the fund balance keeps growing.

The fees vary depending on the size of the screen. They are currently $5 for each device with a screen less than 15 inches (anything 4 inches and less is exempt), $6 for 15- to 34-inch screens and $7 for 35-plus-inch screens. At the CalRecycle monthly public meeting scheduled for June 18, the agency will consider reducing the charges to $4, $5 and $6.

Under the state program, fees are paid on purchases of new CRTs TVs and monitors (not a reality in today’s marketplace), LCD TVs and monitors, laptops and tablets with LCD screens, plasma TVs, and portable DVD players with LCD screens.

The state collects the money and uses it to pay companies that collect and recycle covered devices. CalRecycle currently provides collection and recycling payments of 49 cents per pound for CRTs and 60 cents per pound for non-CRT covered devices. It paid them a combined $53.5 million during the 2017-18 fiscal year.

All told, from Jan. 1, 2005, when the program began, through the end of 2018, the state has paid e-scrap processors about $1 billion to recycle over 2.3 billion pounds.

Dropping weights

California’s program has seen lower collection and recycling weights since 2012, but the decreases have accelerated over the past few years, in particular. Last year, CalRecycle received payment claims for just over 100 million pounds of e-scrap, down 21% from 2017, which was down 17% from 2016, which was down 13% from 2015.

“In recent years, the amount of recovered and recycled CRT devices has continued to decline significantly due to legacy stockpile depletion, at the same time as the amount of non-CRT devices increases,” CalRecycle staff wrote in a memo.

The end-of-life stream has been shifting in California for years, as the CRT wave has broken and receded. In 2013, non-CRT devices made up over 2% by weight for the first time. Fast forward to 2017, when they made up 14% by weight. Last year, non-CRT devices made up about 20% of the stream.

The shifts prompted CalRecycle to create a non-CRT payment rate last year. Previously, the agency paid processors the same rate for all covered device types.

Because CalRecycle is paying processors less out of the fund, the balance has grown. CalRecycle expects to end the 2018-19 fiscal year with a fund balance of $113.5 million, up from $110.9 million the year before.

If approved, the lower fees would go into effect starting Jan. 1, 2020, midway through the 2019-20 fiscal year, which starts July 2019 and runs through June 2020. If CalRecycle kept the current fees, it would collect about $86.5 million during the 2019-20 fiscal year. If it reduces each fee by $1, it would expect to bring in $80.9 million.

In memos, CalRecycle staff say the reduced fees will bring the fund reserve down over the next few fiscal years while still providing enough money to run the program and respond to unexpected expenses.

Photo credit: woff/Shutterstock

 

Tags: CaliforniaEPR
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

PureCycle maintains price expectations for its R-PP resin

EPR clarity is driving brand demand, says PureCycle CEO

byStefanie Valentic
June 1, 2026

With SB 54 registered and lawsuits already filed, PureCycle CEO Dustin Olsen says the fight over what counts as recycling...

Q1 containerboard exports drop by 19%

What SB 54 looks like from the packaging floor

byStefanie Valentic
June 1, 2026

For the brands Sara Lowe works with, SB 54 has stopped being a future problem. As senior executive administrator at...

New York bill would strengthen device repair rules

New York packaging EPR bill faces June 10 deadline

byStefanie Valentic
May 26, 2026

With the legislature set to adjourn June 10, supporters of New York's packaging EPR bill are making a final push.

WM, Circular Materials announce new Canadian facility

byStefanie Valentic
May 21, 2026

Hauler WM will open a new preconditioning recycling facility (PCF) in Edmonton in early 2027, bringing advanced optical sorting to...

EPR rules take shape in Oregon, as first test

Oregon OKs end-market verification from CAA

byStefanie Valentic
May 20, 2026

The state's Department of Environmental Quality has given the stamp of approval on CAA's Responsible End Markets program plan amendment.

Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

byAntoinette Smith
May 20, 2026

Stakeholders applauded the additional allocations proposed, but would like to see distribution re-formulated to more effectively address market realities.

Load More
Next Post
Ingram Micro building exterior.

Partnership model helps firm expand ITAD globally

More Posts

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

Recycling industry addresses Beyond Plastics report

May 26, 2026
What a report on Starbucks cups reveals about recycling

What a report on Starbucks cups reveals about recycling

May 26, 2026
EU recyclers make case for solvent-based methods

The electronics recycling industry has a plastics problem

May 26, 2026
New York bill would strengthen device repair rules

New York packaging EPR bill faces June 10 deadline

May 26, 2026
Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

Illinois expands battery recycling as lithium-ion fire concerns mount

May 27, 2026
Federal PACK Act aims to preempt ‘patchwork’ of state laws

House advances Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act

May 21, 2026
Bottle bill backers see opportunity for action

PET collapse exposes gaps in US recycling infrastructure

May 15, 2026
Plastic packaging

Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

May 19, 2026
CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

Underwater data centers drive shift in ITAD models

May 26, 2026
EPR rules take shape in Oregon, as first test

Oregon OKs end-market verification from CAA

May 20, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.