Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

    Closed Loop Partners acquires Sutter Metals, connecting electronics disposition to metals recovery

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

    Closed Loop Partners acquires Sutter Metals, connecting electronics disposition to metals recovery

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

State looks to reduce e-scrap program revenues

byJared Paben
June 13, 2019
in E-Scrap
Laptops displayed at an electronics store.

California regulators plan to lower the fees consumers pay to fund electronics recycling. The issue? The state is accumulating too much money.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which oversees the oldest state e-scrap recycling program in the country, is proposing to lower the fees consumers pay when they buy new electronics.

The move is in response to e-scrap processors handling significantly lower weights of regulated material in recent years. As a result, CalRecycle is paying processors less money out of the state fund, and the fund balance keeps growing.

The fees vary depending on the size of the screen. They are currently $5 for each device with a screen less than 15 inches (anything 4 inches and less is exempt), $6 for 15- to 34-inch screens and $7 for 35-plus-inch screens. At the CalRecycle monthly public meeting scheduled for June 18, the agency will consider reducing the charges to $4, $5 and $6.

Under the state program, fees are paid on purchases of new CRTs TVs and monitors (not a reality in today’s marketplace), LCD TVs and monitors, laptops and tablets with LCD screens, plasma TVs, and portable DVD players with LCD screens.

The state collects the money and uses it to pay companies that collect and recycle covered devices. CalRecycle currently provides collection and recycling payments of 49 cents per pound for CRTs and 60 cents per pound for non-CRT covered devices. It paid them a combined $53.5 million during the 2017-18 fiscal year.

All told, from Jan. 1, 2005, when the program began, through the end of 2018, the state has paid e-scrap processors about $1 billion to recycle over 2.3 billion pounds.

Dropping weights

California’s program has seen lower collection and recycling weights since 2012, but the decreases have accelerated over the past few years, in particular. Last year, CalRecycle received payment claims for just over 100 million pounds of e-scrap, down 21% from 2017, which was down 17% from 2016, which was down 13% from 2015.

“In recent years, the amount of recovered and recycled CRT devices has continued to decline significantly due to legacy stockpile depletion, at the same time as the amount of non-CRT devices increases,” CalRecycle staff wrote in a memo.

The end-of-life stream has been shifting in California for years, as the CRT wave has broken and receded. In 2013, non-CRT devices made up over 2% by weight for the first time. Fast forward to 2017, when they made up 14% by weight. Last year, non-CRT devices made up about 20% of the stream.

The shifts prompted CalRecycle to create a non-CRT payment rate last year. Previously, the agency paid processors the same rate for all covered device types.

Because CalRecycle is paying processors less out of the fund, the balance has grown. CalRecycle expects to end the 2018-19 fiscal year with a fund balance of $113.5 million, up from $110.9 million the year before.

If approved, the lower fees would go into effect starting Jan. 1, 2020, midway through the 2019-20 fiscal year, which starts July 2019 and runs through June 2020. If CalRecycle kept the current fees, it would collect about $86.5 million during the 2019-20 fiscal year. If it reduces each fee by $1, it would expect to bring in $80.9 million.

In memos, CalRecycle staff say the reduced fees will bring the fund reserve down over the next few fiscal years while still providing enough money to run the program and respond to unexpected expenses.

Photo credit: woff/Shutterstock

 

Tags: CaliforniaEPR
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

Oregon’s battery EPR bill officially charged for implementation

byStefanie Valentic
April 10, 2026

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed HB 4144 into law on April 7, setting into motion the mechanics for an extended...

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

byChristine Yeager
April 10, 2026

EPR is not asking companies to be perfect, but rather to be honest about what their packaging costs the system,...

Bill to update New Jersey e-scrap program heads to governor

New Jersey recyclers talk EPR

byBrian Clark Howard
April 9, 2026

At the Association of New Jersey Recyclers’ spring meeting industry representatives discussed the state and future of the sector.

AF&PA states disappointment over Oregon EPR decision

byStefanie Valentic
April 8, 2026

The American Forest & Paper Association is responding after a federal judge blocked the trade group's bid to intervene in...

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

byAntoinette Smith
April 8, 2026

Longer-term actions support domestic RPET markets and can help prevent the loss of public trust in recycling systems, industry experts...

MRF equipment firm Machinex wins patent fight with rival

Judge blocks four groups from joining Oregon Recycling Act injunction

byStefanie Valentic
April 7, 2026

A judge has shut the door on four industry groups seeking to join NAW's Oregon EPR injunction and clarified who's...

Load More
Next Post
Ingram Micro building exterior.

Partnership model helps firm expand ITAD globally

More Posts

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

April 10, 2026
Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

April 9, 2026

WM opens new $60m MRF in Indy

April 10, 2026

Trafigura signs $1.1b deal for recycled battery metals

April 8, 2026
Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

April 13, 2026
Solarcycle starts up Georgia recycling plant

S3399 signals a shift in how states are tackling solar panel waste

April 6, 2026

GFL acquires SECURE Waste for $6.4bn

April 13, 2026
Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

April 13, 2026
End markets, policy key to RPET viability

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

April 8, 2026
Industry group: Help us find the plastic bale volumes we need

PET bales sink further as other grades firm 

April 15, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.