Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 13, 2026

    Data quantifies progress on plastic recycling

    Inside the Circle: Don’t break the sustainable accounting system

    Assurant releases Q2 trade-in and upgrade data

    iPhone changes could flip script on secondhand market

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 13, 2026

    Data quantifies progress on plastic recycling

    Inside the Circle: Don’t break the sustainable accounting system

    Assurant releases Q2 trade-in and upgrade data

    iPhone changes could flip script on secondhand market

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

State looks to reduce e-scrap program revenues

byJared Paben
June 13, 2019
in E-Scrap
Laptops displayed at an electronics store.

California regulators plan to lower the fees consumers pay to fund electronics recycling. The issue? The state is accumulating too much money.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which oversees the oldest state e-scrap recycling program in the country, is proposing to lower the fees consumers pay when they buy new electronics.

The move is in response to e-scrap processors handling significantly lower weights of regulated material in recent years. As a result, CalRecycle is paying processors less money out of the state fund, and the fund balance keeps growing.

The fees vary depending on the size of the screen. They are currently $5 for each device with a screen less than 15 inches (anything 4 inches and less is exempt), $6 for 15- to 34-inch screens and $7 for 35-plus-inch screens. At the CalRecycle monthly public meeting scheduled for June 18, the agency will consider reducing the charges to $4, $5 and $6.

Under the state program, fees are paid on purchases of new CRTs TVs and monitors (not a reality in today’s marketplace), LCD TVs and monitors, laptops and tablets with LCD screens, plasma TVs, and portable DVD players with LCD screens.

The state collects the money and uses it to pay companies that collect and recycle covered devices. CalRecycle currently provides collection and recycling payments of 49 cents per pound for CRTs and 60 cents per pound for non-CRT covered devices. It paid them a combined $53.5 million during the 2017-18 fiscal year.

All told, from Jan. 1, 2005, when the program began, through the end of 2018, the state has paid e-scrap processors about $1 billion to recycle over 2.3 billion pounds.

Dropping weights

California’s program has seen lower collection and recycling weights since 2012, but the decreases have accelerated over the past few years, in particular. Last year, CalRecycle received payment claims for just over 100 million pounds of e-scrap, down 21% from 2017, which was down 17% from 2016, which was down 13% from 2015.

“In recent years, the amount of recovered and recycled CRT devices has continued to decline significantly due to legacy stockpile depletion, at the same time as the amount of non-CRT devices increases,” CalRecycle staff wrote in a memo.

The end-of-life stream has been shifting in California for years, as the CRT wave has broken and receded. In 2013, non-CRT devices made up over 2% by weight for the first time. Fast forward to 2017, when they made up 14% by weight. Last year, non-CRT devices made up about 20% of the stream.

The shifts prompted CalRecycle to create a non-CRT payment rate last year. Previously, the agency paid processors the same rate for all covered device types.

Because CalRecycle is paying processors less out of the fund, the balance has grown. CalRecycle expects to end the 2018-19 fiscal year with a fund balance of $113.5 million, up from $110.9 million the year before.

If approved, the lower fees would go into effect starting Jan. 1, 2020, midway through the 2019-20 fiscal year, which starts July 2019 and runs through June 2020. If CalRecycle kept the current fees, it would collect about $86.5 million during the 2019-20 fiscal year. If it reduces each fee by $1, it would expect to bring in $80.9 million.

In memos, CalRecycle staff say the reduced fees will bring the fund reserve down over the next few fiscal years while still providing enough money to run the program and respond to unexpected expenses.

Photo credit: woff/Shutterstock

 

Tags: CaliforniaEPR
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

CarbonLite to open $60 million Pennsylvania plant

Federal judge blocks CA ‘Truth in Recycling’ (SB 343) law

byStefanie Valentic
July 15, 2026

A federal judge has blocked California from enforcing SB 343's recyclability labeling restrictions, ruling the "Truth in Recycling" law is...

SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

byAntoinette Smith
July 7, 2026

While the state extended the incentive program, the status of a separate bill with similar goals is uncertain.

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

Load More
Next Post
Ingram Micro building exterior.

Partnership model helps firm expand ITAD globally

More Posts

CarbonLite to open $60 million Pennsylvania plant

Federal judge blocks CA ‘Truth in Recycling’ (SB 343) law

July 15, 2026

Plastics ease as paper, cans steady

July 13, 2026
Data quantifies progress on plastic recycling

Inside the Circle: Don’t break the sustainable accounting system

July 13, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
Greg Saxon to lead The Recycling Partnership

Greg Saxon to lead The Recycling Partnership

July 15, 2026
APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

July 9, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

July 10, 2026
Auto Draft

Mint spins off battery recovery biz as it prepares US launch

July 15, 2026
Plastics ease as paper, cans steady

Mars increases use of recycled content

July 14, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.