Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    CompuCycle brings e-plastic recycling upgrade online

    Quantum expands e-plastics recovery

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 4, 2026

    Building a cleaner future through digital transformation

    Q1 earnings confirm wave of ITAD decommissioning

    Sundry Photography / Shutterstock

    Iron Mountain puts ITAD at the center of its growth

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for May 2026

    Apple store

    Apple leads on inputs, faces questions on ITAD

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    CompuCycle brings e-plastic recycling upgrade online

    Quantum expands e-plastics recovery

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 4, 2026

    Building a cleaner future through digital transformation

    Q1 earnings confirm wave of ITAD decommissioning

    Sundry Photography / Shutterstock

    Iron Mountain puts ITAD at the center of its growth

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for May 2026

    Apple store

    Apple leads on inputs, faces questions on ITAD

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Judge: Counties responsible for some stockpile cleanup costs

byJared Paben
November 29, 2018
in E-Scrap
Detail view of courthouse pillars.

Two counties that provided e-scrap to failed processor Creative Recycling Systems must help pay cleanup costs incurred after the material was abandoned, a judge decided.

A federal judge on Nov. 14 decided South Carolina’s Horry and Lexington counties are legally responsible for some of the costs of cleaning out the jam-packed, polluted warehouse in Blythewood, S.C. Horry County must pay $168,000 and Lexington County must pay $72,000.

But in his ruling, Chief Judge Terry Wooten also decided the landlord is partially responsible for costs, because the company didn’t do all it could to mitigate the mess.

The ruling marks a possible conclusion to the case of Carolina Pines I LLC v. Abbeville Public Works et al, which is in U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina. The dispute revolved around whether nearly a dozen local governments that contracted with Creative Recycling Systems to take e-scrap were responsible for cleanup costs after Creative went bankrupt.

Based in Florida, Creative had locations in six eastern states when it filed for bankruptcy in September 2014, leaving property owners with millions of pounds of scrap electronics on hand, including substantial volumes of CRTs. The property owners worked with state officials to remove a total of 32 million pounds, E-Scrap News reported earlier this year.

Carolina Pines I owned the Blythewood, S.C. facility once leased by Creative. When the processor failed, it left a warehouse with nearly 6.5 million pounds of e-scrap packed so tightly it was difficult for people to move around inside. Additionally, more than a dozen 53-foot trailers full of material were stored outside, unable to be unloaded because the open-air warehouse was so full. A mechanical crusher had been used on site, and testing showed dust on surfaces throughout the building contained arsenic, chromium, copper, iron, lead, nickel, manganese, rubidium, strontium, titanium, tungsten, zinc and zirconium.

Carolina Pines I paid nearly $1.5 million to remove the material and clean up the site, before later selling the property. In April 2016, it sued the 11 South Carolina cities and counties, citing various legal reasons why they were responsible for cleanup expenses.

In March 2018, Judge Wooten dismissed all the claims except one alleging the local governments are liable under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), which is also known as the Superfund law.

The non-jury trial was held Aug. 28-29. By then, all but three of the defendants had settled and agreed to pay Carolina Pines I various dollars amounts. After the trial but before the decision, Charleston County also settled. In total, the settling parties paid Carolina Pines I $356,000.

Wooten’s decision only applies to the remaining two defendants, Horry and Lexington counties. He decided that, under Superfund law, the counties were responsible for cleanup costs because they had arranged for material to be delivered to the warehouse.

Together, the two counties had provided about 40 percent of the material that had been delivered to the warehouse, Wooten determined. But he didn’t stick them with 40 percent of the bill. In fact, he cut the amount they must pay down to 16 percent of cleanup costs. He did that because he decided Carolina Pines I could have done more to prevent the problem, too.

“Plaintiff was the only party involved in this lawsuit with access to the facility and the right to inspect the property,” he wrote. “With the knowledge Plaintiff had regarding the materials being stored in its warehouse, it could have taken steps to ensure there would be proper storage to prevent or limit a release of hazardous materials. Some crushing of hazardous materials took place in the facility. Certain components of the e-waste contributed to the release. If Plaintiff had inspected its property, less release and fewer cleanup costs may have resulted.”

In contrast, the two counties didn’t have keys to the facilities, and they had at least ensured Creative was certified before contracting with the company. Additionally, Lexington County had sent staff members to take a look at the Blythewood facility after the county was notified Creative had first opened that site, Wooten said.

Photo credit: Brandon Bourdages/Shutterstock
 

Tags: Legal
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

ExxonMobil files suit against California AG for defamation

Legal issues continue for canceled Pennsylvania project 

byAntoinette Smith
March 13, 2026

A Pennsylvania engineering consultancy is seeking to impose sanctions on chemical recycler Encina for work relating to a project in...

ERI sues Revivn alleging raid on staff and trade secrets

ERI sues Revivn alleging raid on staff and trade secrets

byScott Snowden
March 10, 2026

ERI has filed a lawsuit against Revivn in New York Supreme Court alleging trade secret theft and a coordinated effort...

Texas sues over dumped wind turbine blades

Texas sues over dumped wind turbine blades

byScott Snowden
February 10, 2026

The state attorney general sued Global Fiberglass Solutions over alleged illegal storage and disposal of all turbine blades at two...

Malaysia clamps down on illegal e-waste imports amid probes

Malaysia clamps down on illegal e-waste imports amid probes

byDavid Daoud
February 6, 2026

Malaysia’s growing role as a hub for global e‑scrap is colliding with corruption probes, large container seizures and regional backlash. ...

Producers settle with California AG over plastic bag claims

byAntoinette Smith
January 26, 2026

The most recent settlements bring the total of penalties and fees payable to the AG's office to $5.1 million from...

Reynolds faces hefty lawsuit for its PE bags

Reynolds faces hefty lawsuit for its PE bags

byStefanie Valentic
September 3, 2025

Reynolds Consumer Products is facing a new lawsuit from the Arizona attorney general regarding its Hefty and Great Value brand...

Load More
Next Post
iPhone screen with the Amazon icon.

Apple-Amazon deal shuts out independent refurbishers

More Posts

New version of California EPR regulations released

CalRecycle approves SB 54 regulations

May 2, 2026
Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

May 6, 2026

Origin Materials to shut down, sell PET cap design

May 6, 2026
Texas plant in limbo after Eastman loses DOE grant

Eastman cites RPET adoption for growth

May 5, 2026
Fiber producers push for June price increases

Fiber producers push for June price increases

May 5, 2026
Plastic Ingenuity to use PureCycle PP for coffee lids

Plastic Ingenuity to use PureCycle PP for coffee lids

April 30, 2026
Electronics are the fire risk battery EPR keeps missing

Electronics are the fire risk battery EPR keeps missing

May 4, 2026
Study quantifies lithium battery threat to infrastructure

Battery fires remain elevated in early 2026: report

May 1, 2026
Sundry Photography / Shutterstock

Iron Mountain puts ITAD at the center of its growth

May 5, 2026
Lithium-ion battery recycler to build New York facility

Why battery EPR doesn’t have a packaging problem

May 4, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.