Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

One Northeast state OKs changes to its e-scrap law

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
October 26, 2017
in E-Scrap
One Northeast state OKs changes to its e-scrap law

Rhode Island’s e-scrap law received some updates this month, requiring certain manufacturers to join the state-run collection program while allowing more flexibility for OEMs running independent plans.

First passed in 2009 and updated in 2013, the Ocean State’s extended producer responsibility legislation requires manufacturers to fund the collection and recycling of computers, monitors, TVs and several additional electronic devices at end of life.Similar to a number of other states with EPR programs for electronics, Rhode Island’s program has had problems with manufacturer targets not keeping up with the actual amount of covered electronics entering the waste stream. In years past, that has led collection sites to shut down mid-year without funding. State officials set manufacturer collection targets each year but have had trouble setting targets in recent years due to a lack of reliable data.Senate Bill 888, which took effect when the bill was signed into law earlier this month, expands the “covered device” categories, specifying tablets are included and creating a pathway to add printers into the state program.Printers will be added to the list of covered devices if, starting in 2020, they grow to 20 percent or more of the total returns of covered electronics. According to the National Center for Electronics Recycling (NCER), printers are a growing portion of the return stream in other states with similar covered product scopes. In Oregon, printers now make up 10 to 15 percent of the weight collected, according to NCER.

Other program changes

The legislation slightly relaxes the requirements for manufacturers managing independent plans, which can now be renewed for two years instead of annually. It creates a new allowance for manufacturers to come in either 10 percent under or over their weight-based collection and recycling targets. They can then carry those deficits or credits over to the next year. The bill also creates a new requirement that TV manufacturers with a market share of less than 5 percent must participate in the state-operated program, billed at $0.30 per pound for the 2018 program year. Previously, they could manage an independent program instead. The bill allows TVs to be counted as orphan waste if their manufacturer has gone out of business or cannot be identified. The orphan category is also expanded to include products from brands that make up less than 1 percent of the return share. Many returns fall into this category, according to NCER.According to the stateDepartment of Environmental Management, the new law also requires that manufacturers submit quarterly reports providing information on the progress of their plan. The state recently publishedmanufacturers’ collection shares for the 2018 program year.

Stakeholders in support

Product Stewardship Institute (PSI), a national nonprofit group that promotes extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation, expressed dismay that printers were not added outright but said the expansion of covered devices is a step in the right direction.“A broad product scope not only increases the amount of e-waste collected but also usually improves the quality of collected recyclables to reduce program costs,” said Sarah Bonelli, associate for policy and programs at PSI. In a statement, Bonelli told E-Scrap News the 10 percent allowance provisions will provide more stability to OEMs running their own plans.“Manufacturers must collect a predetermined number of pounds each year, and this frees them from the confines of the annual calendar while still meeting the requirements,” she said.According to PSI, 12 percent of OEMs were participating in the state plan before this legislation, with the rest managing their own individual plan or joining a manufacturers’ collective plan.“These alternatives duplicated and undermined the existing public infrastructure,” Bonelli said. “The amendment guarantees continued easy, convenient consumer access to free recycling opportunities.”Overall, Bonelli said the bill improves the state program and makes changes that are in line with PSI’s “Elements of a Stable Electronics Program” guidelines.The quasi-governmental Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation (RIRRC), which works in concert with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management to run the state program, said the bill improves the program particularly by expanding the definition of “covered devices.”“The legislation provides the resources needed so that the original intent of the law — that manufacturers, and not Resource Recovery, are wholly responsible for the cost of the program — is met,” RIRRC said in a statement. “We believe these changes will reduce operating losses for Resource Recovery while still providing convenient and responsible recycling of electronic waste for Rhode Island residents.”

Opposition weighs in

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA), which represents OEMs and advocates on legislative issues nationwide, voiced opposition to the bill in written testimony. The legislation creates “unnecessary burdens to Rhode Island’s e-waste programs without increasing opportunities for electronics recycling to Rhode Island residents,” wrote Walter Alcorn, vice president of environmental affairs and industry sustainability for CTA.The association opposed the addition of printers and tablets to the covered device category, noting there are already manufacturer plans in place that accept printers and tablets for no cost.“The law should focus on products that need help to be recycled and should not include products which the market currently takes care of on its own,” Alcorn wrote.CTA also opposed expanded reporting requirements implemented by the law. TechNet, an industry association representing tech companies, voiced similar concerns in written testimony.

 

Tags: EPRLegislation & EnforcementOEMsPolicy Now

TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Oregon’s battery EPR bill officially charged for implementation

byStefanie Valentic
April 10, 2026

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed HB 4144 into law on April 7, setting into motion the mechanics for an extended...

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

byChristine Yeager
April 10, 2026

EPR is not asking companies to be perfect, but rather to be honest about what their packaging costs the system,...

Bill to update New Jersey e-scrap program heads to governor

New Jersey recyclers talk EPR

byBrian Clark Howard
April 9, 2026

At the Association of New Jersey Recyclers’ spring meeting industry representatives discussed the state and future of the sector.

AF&PA states disappointment over Oregon EPR decision

byStefanie Valentic
April 8, 2026

The American Forest & Paper Association is responding after a federal judge blocked the trade group's bid to intervene in...

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

byAntoinette Smith
April 8, 2026

Longer-term actions support domestic RPET markets and can help prevent the loss of public trust in recycling systems, industry experts...

MRF equipment firm Machinex wins patent fight with rival

Judge blocks four groups from joining Oregon Recycling Act injunction

byStefanie Valentic
April 7, 2026

A judge has shut the door on four industry groups seeking to join NAW's Oregon EPR injunction and clarified who's...

Load More
Next Post

Data Corner: The terms used most often in outreach

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling
Sponsored

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling

byThe Battery Network
April 13, 2026

We’re connecting people, brands, and communities through one nationwide network built to make battery recycling safer, simpler, and more accessible...

Read moreDetails

More Posts

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

April 10, 2026

Recycling Partnership CEO stepping down

April 15, 2026
Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

April 13, 2026
Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

April 9, 2026

WM opens new $60m MRF in Indy

April 10, 2026
Industry group: Help us find the plastic bale volumes we need

PET bales sink further as other grades firm 

April 15, 2026

GFL acquires SECURE Waste for $6.4bn

April 13, 2026
Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

April 13, 2026
Solarcycle starts up Georgia recycling plant

S3399 signals a shift in how states are tackling solar panel waste

April 6, 2026

Amazon, DOE partner on critical materials recovery

April 13, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.