Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Total Reclaim hit with new allegations and penalty

byJared Paben
April 6, 2017
in E-Scrap
flat panels for recycling

Oregon regulators have fined Total Reclaim more than $160,000 for allegedly violating hazardous waste laws, but the e-scrap processor denies the allegations and has appealed the penalty.

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) on April 3 issued a press release announcing the $164,400 civil penalty. In addition, DEQ revealed that Total Reclaim was cut off from receiving e-scrap through the state’s extended producer responsibility program last year.

The actions stem from an investigation by Seattle-based watchdog group Basel Action Network (BAN), which used GPS tracking devices to follow the downstream destinations of electronics. It released the results of the effort, which it calls the e-Trash Transparency Project, in May 2016. Named in the report, Total Reclaim then acknowledged it had exported flat-panel displays to undocumented recycling facilities in Hong Kong. The company owner recently said that export activity is no longer occurring.

In response, Washington Department of Ecology issued a $444,000 fine against Total Reclaim, which is also appealing that enforcement action.

Oregon fines

DEQ said the company exported mercury- and lead-containing flat-screen devices generated at its Portland, Ore. location from 2009 to 2015. DEQ claims the flat-screens were considered “residue” or “solid waste” because they were shipped to China for disposal.

The penalty documents, dated March 7, allege Total Reclaim violated Oregon law by failing to determine that the “residue” was considered hazardous waste, based on its lead content. Additionally, DEQ alleged Total Reclaim should have transported the material with a uniform hazardous waste manifest, instead of a bill of lading. Lastly, the state accused the company of failing to submit required annual hazardous waste permits and fees.

DEQ is also requiring the company to submit annual hazardous waste generator reports for 2013 to 2015 and to pay unpaid generator fees.

On March 27, Richard Allan, an attorney for Total Reclaim, appealed the penalty and requested a hearing. The appeal document claims Total Reclaim transported flat-screens from its Portland location to its Seattle facility, where some were ultimately sold to a company called M-Stream.

“On information and belief, after M-Stream bought the used flat-screen devices from Total Reclaim, it sold and arranged for shipping them from Seattle to a facility or facilities in Hong Kong of its choosing,” Allan wrote.

In the appeal, Total Reclaim claims the flat-screens were considered “used products,” not “waste,” under the law. As such, it wasn’t under any obligation to characterize them or meet hazardous waste manifesting requirements before shipping them to Seattle.

In a separate letter, Allan requested an informal discussion with DEQ to reach an agreement before the hearing.

“As we indicated in our October 24, 2016 and November 30, 2016 correspondence, we believe that DEQ’s allegations lack merit but also that DEQ and Total Reclaim can better put their resources toward a settlement of the claims as opposed to litigating them,” he wrote.

Craig Lorch, the owner of Total Reclaim, told E-Scrap News the company is “working with the agency to resolve the issue quickly, so that we can return our focus to recycling materials collected from Oregon residents and businesses.”

Program pounds

Total Reclaim was a significant player receiving pounds under Oregon’s manufacturer-funded electronics recycling program, called Oregon E-Cycles. After the BAN report came out, it was cut out of receiving pounds, according to DEQ.

“In mid-2016, DEQ learned that Total Reclaim may have illegally disposed of electronic waste overseas. Oregon E-Cycles recycling programs promptly stopped their use of Total Reclaim after these actions were discovered,” according to the press release.

Data obtained by E-Scrap News from DEQ via a public records request shows Total Reclaim managed 2.2 million pounds in 2016, or 8.3 percent of electronics flowing through Oregon E-Cycles. That was down from 5.5 million pounds in 2015, or 18.7 percent of the electronics flowing through the program that year. The year-over-year decrease of 3.4 million pounds represented a 61 percent drop for Total Reclaim.

As is the case with some other states with mature e-scrap programs, the total pounds collected in Oregon continues to drop, a result of the clearing out of heavier CRT devices. In 2016, a total of 25.9 million pounds were processed through Oregon E-Cycles, a 12 percent drop from the year before.

In Washington, the extended producer responsibility program for electronics, the similarly named E-Cycle Washington, dramatically reduced pounds allocated to Total Reclaim. In 2016, the weight it received through E-Cycle Washington dropped by 8.8 million pounds, a 40 percent decrease over the year before, although it remained the single largest processor in the state. Overall, E-Cycle Washington in 2016 collected 14 percent less weight than the year before.

Lorch said the volume changes in Oregon occurred nearly a year ago, and Total Reclaim made adjustments in staffing and operations some time ago to accommodate them.

“Of course we would like to work with the programs again and see more material, but our focus is on continuing to work with our current customers and rebuilding our reputation,” he said.

 

 

Tags: EPRFlat-panel displaysIndustry Groups
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

byAntoinette Smith
July 9, 2026

The Association of Plastic Recyclers (APR) is expanding its PCR Certification Program to verify the percentage of PCR content in...

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

byAntoinette Smith
July 8, 2026

Upon close examination, data casting doubt on the coffee giant's recycling claims raises more questions than it answers.

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

Load More
Next Post

What comes after 60 percent

More Posts

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

July 6, 2026
Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

July 7, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

July 6, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

July 6, 2026
SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

July 7, 2026
MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

July 3, 2026
ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

July 6, 2026
Auto Draft

Digital product passports offer gateway into secondary market

July 7, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.