Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Comment period opens for final California EPR rules

Marissa HeffernanbyMarissa Heffernan
October 15, 2024
in Recycling
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery on Oct. 14 opened a 15-day written comment period on permanent regulations for the state’s EPR program. | Jonathan-Lenz/Shutterstock

Producers, recyclers and the public have another chance to comment on California’s SB 54 extended producer responsibility for packaging permanent regulations.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, or CalRecycle, opened a 15-day written comment period on SB 54’s permanent regulations, from Oct. 14 through Oct. 29. 

Previously, CalRecycle held a 61-day public comment period in March and a public hearing in April after releasing the draft rules. 

In the revised version, the department adjusted some definitions, including for component, food serviceware, producer, reuse and refill, item and curbside collection. CalRecycle also reorganized the section under which some definitions were housed, including definitions of trademark, compost, digestate from land application, discrete, food packaging, intermediate product and product. 

Diving into reuse specifics

The expanded reuse and refill definition section specifies that to be considered reused or refilled by a producer, items must be recovered from users and returned into the supply chain, and be used or filled either four times or, for plastic items, the number times necessary “so that 75% less plastic waste is generated overall.” 

And for items that are meant to be reused or refilled by someone other than the producer, the item’s “design and marketing must incorporate directions reasonably necessary for such person to understand how to perform such actions completely,” the rules note. 

In addition, the items either have to be accepted back at the same location they were purchased from or within one mile of that location with the same hours of operation. 

“If the item was delivered directly to a consumer, return of the item must be facilitated through the same means (such as the same website) that the consumer used to acquire it and must not require the consumer to travel to a location other than the delivery location,” the rules state. 

Further, returning the item “must not impose limitations or requirements on consumers, such as the use of technologies, access restrictions, or contribution of materials other than the item.” 

Other wording tweaks cover exemptions, markets, chemical recycling

CalRecycle also provided more detail on how to apply for exemptions, such as those for durable packaging; corrective action plans; hearing procedures; and the requirements, exemptions and extensions for local jurisdictions and recycling service providers. 

Several formulas were added to the final rules, including for the evaluation of covered material recyclability rate and recycling rate, and the method of granting source reduction credits. 

A section on additional producer responsibility organizations was struck from the rules, while a section on review of certain technologies was added. One such technology is chemical recycling, which the program will not consider “recycling” until “an independently peer-reviewed scientific study confirms that the technology does not generate a significant amount of hazardous waste.” 

In the responsible end markets section, the final language changed from “the entity shall maximize benefits to the environment and minimize risks to public health and safety” to “the entity shall minimize the discharge of emissions, effluents and materials produced by the entity, including feedstocks and residuals.”

More detail was added about the conditional approval of a producer responsibility plan and to the end market viability section, which was also renamed to end market development. The audits and verifications sections were combined in the final rule, and annual budget reporting was folded into the larger annual plan submission. 

A deadline for producers to register with the department of July 1, 2025, was inserted, and for the time frame to correct errors in submitted data was changed from 10 business days to 14 calendar days. 

Finally, the final rules noted that a PRO may dismiss producers only for “good cause,” after exerting “good faith effort” to resolve the problem. Good cause is defined as substantial noncompliance with the act or requirements of the PRO plan.

Written comments can be submitted on CalRecycle’s website. 

Tags: CaliforniaEPRPolicy Now
TweetShare
Marissa Heffernan

Marissa Heffernan

Marissa Heffernan worked at Resource Recycling from January 2022 through June 2025, first as staff reporter and then as associate editor. Marissa Heffernan started working for Resource Recycling in January 2022 after spending several years as a reporter at a daily newspaper in Southwest Washington. After developing a special focus on recycling policy, they were also the editor of the monthly newsletter Policy Now.

Related Posts

Oregon’s battery EPR bill officially charged for implementation

byStefanie Valentic
April 10, 2026

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed HB 4144 into law on April 7, setting into motion the mechanics for an extended...

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

byChristine Yeager
April 10, 2026

EPR is not asking companies to be perfect, but rather to be honest about what their packaging costs the system,...

Bill to update New Jersey e-scrap program heads to governor

New Jersey recyclers talk EPR

byBrian Clark Howard
April 9, 2026

At the Association of New Jersey Recyclers’ spring meeting industry representatives discussed the state and future of the sector.

AF&PA states disappointment over Oregon EPR decision

byStefanie Valentic
April 8, 2026

The American Forest & Paper Association is responding after a federal judge blocked the trade group's bid to intervene in...

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

End markets, policy key to RPET viability

byAntoinette Smith
April 8, 2026

Longer-term actions support domestic RPET markets and can help prevent the loss of public trust in recycling systems, industry experts...

MRF equipment firm Machinex wins patent fight with rival

Judge blocks four groups from joining Oregon Recycling Act injunction

byStefanie Valentic
April 7, 2026

A judge has shut the door on four industry groups seeking to join NAW's Oregon EPR injunction and clarified who's...

Load More
Next Post

How2Recycle plans 'smart' labels, updates

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling
Sponsored

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling

byThe Battery Network
April 13, 2026

We’re connecting people, brands, and communities through one nationwide network built to make battery recycling safer, simpler, and more accessible...

Read moreDetails

More Posts

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

April 10, 2026

Recycling Partnership CEO stepping down

April 15, 2026
Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

April 13, 2026
Industry group: Help us find the plastic bale volumes we need

PET bales sink further as other grades firm 

April 15, 2026
Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

April 13, 2026

GFL acquires SECURE Waste for $6.4bn

April 13, 2026

WM opens new $60m MRF in Indy

April 10, 2026

Amazon, DOE partner on critical materials recovery

April 13, 2026

Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

April 15, 2026
Solarcycle starts up Georgia recycling plant

S3399 signals a shift in how states are tackling solar panel waste

April 6, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.