Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Microsoft confirms PC sales slump

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for August 2026

    Data erasure firm expands wearable device capabilities

    What Apple’s latest earnings mean for ITAD

    tires

    The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

    Intel sign outside of company building.

    Intel’s CapEx tops $20B on server demand while PC volume shrinks

    Google sign on company building with blue sky and clouds above.

    Inside Alphabet’s Q2 results: More capital spending and cloud backlog

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Microsoft confirms PC sales slump

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for August 2026

    Data erasure firm expands wearable device capabilities

    What Apple’s latest earnings mean for ITAD

    tires

    The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

    Intel sign outside of company building.

    Intel’s CapEx tops $20B on server demand while PC volume shrinks

    Google sign on company building with blue sky and clouds above.

    Inside Alphabet’s Q2 results: More capital spending and cloud backlog

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Comment period opens for final California EPR rules

Marissa HeffernanbyMarissa Heffernan
October 15, 2024
in Recycling
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery on Oct. 14 opened a 15-day written comment period on permanent regulations for the state’s EPR program. | Jonathan-Lenz/Shutterstock

Producers, recyclers and the public have another chance to comment on California’s SB 54 extended producer responsibility for packaging permanent regulations.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, or CalRecycle, opened a 15-day written comment period on SB 54’s permanent regulations, from Oct. 14 through Oct. 29. 

Previously, CalRecycle held a 61-day public comment period in March and a public hearing in April after releasing the draft rules. 

In the revised version, the department adjusted some definitions, including for component, food serviceware, producer, reuse and refill, item and curbside collection. CalRecycle also reorganized the section under which some definitions were housed, including definitions of trademark, compost, digestate from land application, discrete, food packaging, intermediate product and product. 

Diving into reuse specifics

The expanded reuse and refill definition section specifies that to be considered reused or refilled by a producer, items must be recovered from users and returned into the supply chain, and be used or filled either four times or, for plastic items, the number times necessary “so that 75% less plastic waste is generated overall.” 

And for items that are meant to be reused or refilled by someone other than the producer, the item’s “design and marketing must incorporate directions reasonably necessary for such person to understand how to perform such actions completely,” the rules note. 

In addition, the items either have to be accepted back at the same location they were purchased from or within one mile of that location with the same hours of operation. 

“If the item was delivered directly to a consumer, return of the item must be facilitated through the same means (such as the same website) that the consumer used to acquire it and must not require the consumer to travel to a location other than the delivery location,” the rules state. 

Further, returning the item “must not impose limitations or requirements on consumers, such as the use of technologies, access restrictions, or contribution of materials other than the item.” 

Other wording tweaks cover exemptions, markets, chemical recycling

CalRecycle also provided more detail on how to apply for exemptions, such as those for durable packaging; corrective action plans; hearing procedures; and the requirements, exemptions and extensions for local jurisdictions and recycling service providers. 

Several formulas were added to the final rules, including for the evaluation of covered material recyclability rate and recycling rate, and the method of granting source reduction credits. 

A section on additional producer responsibility organizations was struck from the rules, while a section on review of certain technologies was added. One such technology is chemical recycling, which the program will not consider “recycling” until “an independently peer-reviewed scientific study confirms that the technology does not generate a significant amount of hazardous waste.” 

In the responsible end markets section, the final language changed from “the entity shall maximize benefits to the environment and minimize risks to public health and safety” to “the entity shall minimize the discharge of emissions, effluents and materials produced by the entity, including feedstocks and residuals.”

More detail was added about the conditional approval of a producer responsibility plan and to the end market viability section, which was also renamed to end market development. The audits and verifications sections were combined in the final rule, and annual budget reporting was folded into the larger annual plan submission. 

A deadline for producers to register with the department of July 1, 2025, was inserted, and for the time frame to correct errors in submitted data was changed from 10 business days to 14 calendar days. 

Finally, the final rules noted that a PRO may dismiss producers only for “good cause,” after exerting “good faith effort” to resolve the problem. Good cause is defined as substantial noncompliance with the act or requirements of the PRO plan.

Written comments can be submitted on CalRecycle’s website. 

Tags: CaliforniaEPRPolicy Now
TweetShare
Marissa Heffernan

Marissa Heffernan

Marissa Heffernan worked at Resource Recycling from January 2022 through June 2025, first as staff reporter and then as associate editor. Marissa Heffernan started working for Resource Recycling in January 2022 after spending several years as a reporter at a daily newspaper in Southwest Washington. After developing a special focus on recycling policy, they were also the editor of the monthly newsletter Policy Now.

Related Posts

Plastic packaging samples arranged on a table.

What producers got wrong about SB 54’s 25% target

byStefanie Valentic
August 3, 2026

rePurpose Global's Alyssa Dizon says the most common mistake producers make is treating a collective reduction goal as an individual...

CAA opens series of Oregon EPR webinars

byStefanie Valentic
August 3, 2026

CAA is opening a formal consultation series to gather input from producers to regulators before the 2028-2032 blueprint locks in,...

2024 legislatures focus on batteries, state programs

NAW sues Colorado over EPR packaging law

byStefanie Valentic
July 30, 2026

NAW is taking its constitutional case against packaging EPR to Colorado, arguing the state's fee-setting delegation to CAA violates due...

The State of Oregon seal at a park in Salem, Ore.

MRM bids to run Oregon EPR for second year 

byPaul Lane
July 28, 2026

The company won the competitive process for 2026, but was the only company to apply for the 2027 PRO post.

California releases deposit system update draft rules

Groups move to intervene in SB 343 lawsuit

byStefanie Valentic
July 27, 2026

Earth Island Institute and Californians Against Waste have filed to intervene in the federal lawsuit that halted enforcement of California's...

A call to action: End markets and EPR

EPR faces several key questions

byBrian Clark Howard
July 23, 2026

Panelists discuss the promise and perils of EPR nationwide at the PROP conference in Pennsylvania.

Load More
Next Post

How2Recycle plans 'smart' labels, updates

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

2024 legislatures focus on batteries, state programs

NAW sues Colorado over EPR packaging law

July 30, 2026
CarbonLite to open $60 million Pennsylvania plant

Federal judge blocks CA ‘Truth in Recycling’ (SB 343) law

July 15, 2026
tires

The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

August 3, 2026
Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
California releases deposit system update draft rules

Groups move to intervene in SB 343 lawsuit

July 27, 2026
Plastic packaging samples arranged on a table.

What producers got wrong about SB 54’s 25% target

August 3, 2026
The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

Oregon wash hub looks to slash single-use plastic

August 4, 2026
Greyparrot positions waste intel as key to effective EPR

Greyparrot secures $27m for growing AI waste data

July 28, 2026
Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for July 2026

July 1, 2026
The White House in Washington, D.C.

Presidential order empowers feds to block mineral exports

July 31, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.