Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    ESG

    Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 17, 2026

    Sorted: Country roads, take my recycling

    State program revamp proposal advances in Oregon

    Oregon EPR ruling looms: what legal experts think

    Triple-digit revenue gains propel ABTC’s expansion

    LFP batteries gain acceptance. Can they be recycled?

    May pricing bullish for most bales

    August pricing bearish for plastic bales

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    ESG

    Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 17, 2026

    Sorted: Country roads, take my recycling

    State program revamp proposal advances in Oregon

    Oregon EPR ruling looms: what legal experts think

    Triple-digit revenue gains propel ABTC’s expansion

    LFP batteries gain acceptance. Can they be recycled?

    May pricing bullish for most bales

    August pricing bearish for plastic bales

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Studies quantify e-scrap workers’ exposure to toxics

byJared Paben
July 26, 2018
in E-Scrap
lead blood test

This story has been updated. 

Bathroom doors, a water cooler handle, a refrigerator – their surfaces carried lead, cadmium and other hazardous metals, according to studies at two e-scrap facilities.

The health hazard evaluations, which were conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), also found metals and flame retardants on employees hands, in their bodies and in the air. In many cases, the levels were below occupational limits, but in some, concentrations were above.

“The known over-exposures to lead and cadmium as well as other metals are our primary health concern for the‎ electronic scrap recyclers,” Catherine Beaucham, who was involved in both studies, told E-Scrap News.

And concerns extended beyond worker health.

“We also found metals on employees’ hands immediately before they left work at the end of the day,” according to one report. “Take-home lead can contaminate cars and homes, and potentially expose family members.”

NIOSH, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), conducted both studies at the request of facility managers, who worried about employee exposure to hazardous metals and flame retardant chemicals. Industrial hygiene testing involved surface testing as well as hand wipes, blood draws, urine samples air samples and more.

Shredding and sorting system exposure

In March and August 2015, NIOSH staff visited an unnamed facility in Ohio with about 15 employees and a shredding and separation system. The site processes a variety of materials, including computers and related equipment, batteries, fluorescent lamp components and toys.

The following is a summary of select testing results, which were released in an in-depth report:

Surfaces: NIOSH’s testing showed metals migrate throughout the facility. They found metals on surfaces in the break room, bathroom, office and elsewhere. “However, we found that the levels of lead and manganese on the air diffuser in the conference room and on the employee water cooler handle were more than five times greater than on the other surfaces,” according to the report. Nickel was highest on a bathroom door handle and the handle of a water cooler.

Hands: NIOSH tested employees’ hands after they had washed them but before they headed home for the day. They found lead, manganese, nickel and cadmium, but lead had the highest concentration.

Air: Air sampling over three days showed one employee working in the disassembly area was exposed to airborne cadmium above NIOSH’s recommended exposure limit. The good news is other testing for cadmium, lead, manganese and other metals revealed that exposure was below occupational exposure limits (OELs), according to the report.

Mercury vapor: Spot readings detected mercury vapor throughout the facility, but the highest levels, by far, were found in the magnetic metals sorting area. The reports noted that no mercury lamps were shredded during the evaluation, so the metal came from other materials. Researchers said employees were unlikely to exceed mercury exposure limits given where their workstations were located in relation to the shredder.

Blood: While many employees’ lead concentrations were below what NIOSH’s considers an elevated level, three employees in the shredding and sorting areas had higher levels, including one that was more than double the acceptable limit. Cadmium was either not detectable or were well below Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits.

Flame retardants: The analysis included an in-depth look at exposure to flame retardants using a variety of sampling methods. Researchers found employees were exposed to several different types of flame retardants through inhalation and skin contact. Flame retardants in the urine of workers in the shredding and sorting area doubled over the course of their work shifts. They also found flame retardants in blood. “We are not able to predict specific health effects from this because the science is not sufficient to do so at this time,” according to the report. “However, we believe these flame retardants are potentially hazardous.”

Recommendations: NIOSH offered a number of fixes to reduce workers’ exposure. It recommended hiring an engineer to ensure the office gets enough outside air and to ensure warehouse air doesn’t mix with the office air. NIOSH staff suggested the employer provide a lead-removing hand cleaner, noting that soap and water is ineffective in removing lead and other toxic metals. The institute also recommended employees use respirators in the disassembly and shredding areas until controls are put in place to reduce exposures below limits. Finally, researchers suggested the employer provide a laundering service for the clothes of employees exposed to lead or cadmium.

Lower levels detected

Testing brought better news to a different unnamed e-scrap recycling facility, where worker exposure was below occupational limits when it came to lead, cadmium and other metals.

NIOSH staff visited the e-scrap facility in Washington state for testing in February and July 2017. The site, which has a dozen or so employees, does not have a shredding and separation system.

The following is a summary of results detailed in their report:

Surfaces: The door of a refrigerator in the breakroom had the highest concentration of lead, cobalt and chromium. The highest cadmium level was found on the women’s restroom door handle, and the highest copper level was on the men’s restroom door handle. The levels were relatively low, but their presence outside of processing areas increases the risk that employees are accidentally ingesting them when eating.

Hands: Six of eight tested employees had detectable levels of cobalt on their hands, seven had copper and one had beryllium. “Therefore, employees could have transferred metals from their hands to their vehicles and homes,” according to the report.

Air: Air quality sampling showed employees weren’t being exposed to levels of hazardous metals exceeding OELs.

Blood: Results of blood draws from eight employees showed a range of lead and cadmium concentrations in their blood, but all results were well below limits set by OSHA or NIOSH.

Recommendations: NIOSH recommended the use of a lead-removing cleaner for washing hands. The institute also suggested prohibiting employees from using compressed air to clean electronics or dry sweeping to clean the floor, because both methods can kick up dust that’s inhaled. Instead, they suggested using wet-cleaning methods or vacuums instead. They also recommended employees not eat, drink or smoke in work areas.

In general, NIOSH uses a “hierarchy of controls” when making recommendations for ways to reduce employee exposure to toxic materials, Beaucham said.

“Typically we recommend local exhaust ventilation (especially around the metal shredders, if one is present) to physically remove the hazard, administrative controls (especially good housekeeping, medical monitoring, training by the employer), and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE),” she said.

This story has been updated with comments from Beaucham.

Photo credit: Jarun Ontakrai/Shutterstock

 

Tags: Critical MineralsPolicy NowResearch

TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

NAW-backed coalition seeks SB 54 injunction

byStefanie Valentic
August 21, 2026

NAW says SB 54's 2032 recyclability mandate leans on the same standard a federal judge already froze in the SB...

earnings report

Recycling fuels record revenue for ABTC

byPaul Lane
August 20, 2026

Company buoyed by strong performance at its Nevada facility, as well as the reinstatement of a federal grant for mining...

The Maine state capitol building.

No bidders respond to Maine’s EPR RFP

byStefanie Valentic
August 20, 2026

Following CAA's announcement that it would not submit a bid for Maine's EPR program, the state's DEP announced that no...

The Maine state capitol in Augusta.

Circular Action Alliance won’t bid on Maine’s PRO contract

byStefanie Valentic
August 19, 2026

Circular Action Alliance announced it will not submit an RFP to implement Maine's EPR packaging program.

Landfill seen from above with equipment moving materials.

PFAS, EPR reshape waste and recycling policy

byStefanie Valentic
August 19, 2026

David Biderman, industry veteran and consultant, provided a regulatory update to attendees at WR Expo.

EPA takes a closer look at lithium-ion batteries

North American battery recycling market expected to surge

byPaul Lane
August 19, 2026

A new report cites growing EV demand and government intervention as the reasons for expected recycling growth.

Load More
Next Post
iPhone X

High-priced iPhone maintains hefty resale value

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

The Maine state capitol in Augusta.

Circular Action Alliance won’t bid on Maine’s PRO contract

August 19, 2026
The Maine state capitol building.

No bidders respond to Maine’s EPR RFP

August 20, 2026
Company debuts battery-containing device shredder

New battery shredding system debuts stateside

August 20, 2026
State program revamp proposal advances in Oregon

Oregon EPR ruling looms: what legal experts think

August 17, 2026
PureCycle sees easing headwinds to R-PP adoption

PureCycle says H2 outlook already playing out 

August 13, 2026
ESG

Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

August 19, 2026
Google explores how to capture 4.5 billion tons of plastic

Bale pricing diverges for August

August 18, 2026
End markets, policy key to RPET viability

PET in focus: Is help on the way?

August 17, 2026
Triple-digit revenue gains propel ABTC’s expansion

LFP batteries gain acceptance. Can they be recycled?

August 17, 2026
May pricing bullish for most bales

August pricing bearish for plastic bales

August 17, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.