Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Apple Watch on product box.

    Wearables are coming and ITAD isn’t ready

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 13, 2026

    EV Battery Pack - Sergii Chernov-Shutterstock

    Redwood, Rivian deal fuels US infrastructure plans

    Bloom ESG and e-Stewards roll out critical metals metric

    Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

    Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

    Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

    Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

    Certification Scorecard — Week of April 6, 2026

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Analysis Opinion

In My Opinion: Addressing reactions to e-scrap tracking

byJim Puckett
February 8, 2018
in Opinion

E-Scrap News has now published responses from five of the six companies named in Basel Action Network’s latest export report (“The Scam Recycling Continues”). In their statements, those companies have made some assertions that warrant a response. In addition, one of the company responses noted a geographic error in the recent report, and we wish to publicly correct that fact. The inaccuracy, while regrettable, has no bearing on the findings of export in the report.

Jim Puckett, Basel Action Network

What follows is the BAN response to each of the five reactions from e-scrap processors.

Allied Ecovery: The latest company perspective, appearing in E-Scrap News on Feb. 1, was from Allied Ecovery. The processor postulated that the tracker used to pin Allied to a chain of export must have been manually separated from the LCD monitor it was installed in, then placed into the plastic stream, added to a bale, and exported as plastic waste in compliance with laws and the R2 standard.

In an extended explanation we have posted online, we conclude that such a theory is in fact highly implausible. Additionally, if it were possible, this export would clearly be a non-compliant with the law and with R2, as our current trackers do not contain plastic except as shrink-wrap and circuit board substrate but do contain batteries and a circuit board, both of which are “focus” materials.

Advanced Technology Recycling: ATR published a lengthy rebuttal of BAN findings on its website, and an abbreviated version of the response appeared in E-Scrap News alongside three other responses on Jan. 25.

ATR claims that BAN is on a “witch hunt” and is trying to “discredit companies not willing to certify to the e-Stewards standard.” BAN has always denounced companies that export their hazardous e-waste to developing countries, and the organization has created and promoted the e-Stewards Standard precisely because R2 does not always prohibit such exports. However, we do in fact have a full-time, ongoing Performance Verification program that routinely places GPS trackers into the input streams of recyclers certified to e-Stewards, especially “targeting” them in this regard.

To be clear, in our first GPS tracking report, “Scam Recycling,” we endeavored to distribute our trackers statistically in accordance with the existent proportion of R2, e-Stewards, and uncertified companies so we could assess the relative percentage of companies found within export chains within each category. With that balanced approach, we discovered that R2 exported at a higher rate than even uncertified companies, and companies certified to e-Stewards were exposed in export chains at the lowest rate of all categories. Nevertheless, in the course of that study, we caught, exposed and removed a founding e-Stewards-certified recycler, Seattle-based Total Reclaim.

Since that initial study, the intent and purpose for deploying trackers based on our funders’ wishes is different. The new objective is now “citizen enforcement” rather than trade analysis. Our deployment decisions thus are now made on the basis of risk, and our risk profile does not include certification as a criterion.

ATR also expressed confusion regarding geographic coordinates given in our report, and on this point we acknowledge a mistake. The latitude and longitude points listed for the Pakistan destination of the ATR tracker were erroneous. This has now been corrected in the online report. We understand ATR’s confusion in this regard, and we apologize for the error. However, this mistake does not change the narrative reported in any way.

Finally, ATR has asked us to provide the company with more detail on the export chain we revealed. We have provided this information to ATR via email. The company has also asked for a list of all 60 companies in the U.S. where we deployed trackers. We will certainly provide that list for the three states of Florida, Georgia, and Texas when the 60 devices delivered there are no longer active.

Arc Broward IT Asset Recovery: Arc Broward representatives have written that they are going to take corrective actions with respect to their downstream vendor that has failed to comply with laws rules and guidelines. We applaud Arc Broward for using our data in a positive way.

CompuCycle: CompuCycle has written that BAN tried to besmirch the company’s reputation, but that was not our underlying intent. We are simply trying to end unethical, illegal and environmentally damaging exports of electronic waste by providing evidence of export to companies and to the public and law enforcement.

Raki Electronics Recycling: Raki expressed surprise and disappointment and have initiated an internal audit to conduct due diligence on the matter. We also applaud Raki for using our data in a positive way.

Ready to help firms with downstream tracking

BAN continues to find that the use of GPS trackers to expose illegal and unethical exports of electronic waste is a powerful tool and motivator. Our first commitment in this regard is to conduct such tracking within our own e-Stewards certification program. But it is our goal also to ensure that the entire industry and all standards respect human rights and the environment and comply fully with the Basel Convention and its decisions.

Responsible recycling companies can be plagued with downstream vendors that cheat on their no-export commitments. For this reason, BAN encourages all electronics recyclers to contact BAN to privately contract for our tracking services. We are ready and willing to help all recyclers and enterprise companies to audit their downstream partners.

Progress is being made. We need everyone’s help to finally eradicate unethical actors that, via export, create an uneven economic playing field while promoting real planetary harm.

Jim Puckett is the executive director of the Basel Action Network and can be contacted at [email protected].

 

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Resource Recycling, Inc. If you have a subject you wish to cover in an op-ed, please send a short proposal to [email protected] for consideration.

Tags: AsiaPolicy NowTrade & Tariffs
TweetShare
Jim Puckett

Jim Puckett

Related Posts

Volatility reshapes outlook for US metals businesses

byScott Snowden
April 15, 2026

Panelists at the ReMA conference in Las Vegas said tariffs, reshoring and geopolitical tension are remaking trade flows, lifting US...

Matium raises $8m, adds buyer financing

byAntoinette Smith
April 14, 2026

A trade finance facility from the new Erebor Bank will help bridge the gap between buyer and seller payment terms...

Oregon’s battery EPR bill officially charged for implementation

byStefanie Valentic
April 10, 2026

Oregon Governor Tina Kotek signed HB 4144 into law on April 7, setting into motion the mechanics for an extended...

AF&PA states disappointment over Oregon EPR decision

byStefanie Valentic
April 8, 2026

The American Forest & Paper Association is responding after a federal judge blocked the trade group's bid to intervene in...

MRF equipment firm Machinex wins patent fight with rival

Judge blocks four groups from joining Oregon Recycling Act injunction

byStefanie Valentic
April 7, 2026

A judge has shut the door on four industry groups seeking to join NAW's Oregon EPR injunction and clarified who's...

UBC stakeholders report on recycling progress

Trump’s Section 232 tariff overhaul provides mixed results for recycling industry

byStefanie Valentic
April 7, 2026

A sweeping overhaul of the Section 232 steel and aluminum derivatives tariff program took effect April 6, slashing duty rates...

Load More
Next Post
courtroom

Lawsuit claims supplier misrepresented device quality

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling
Sponsored

Leading the Charge in Safe Battery Recycling

byThe Battery Network
April 13, 2026

We’re connecting people, brands, and communities through one nationwide network built to make battery recycling safer, simpler, and more accessible...

Read moreDetails

More Posts

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

April 10, 2026

Recycling Partnership CEO stepping down

April 15, 2026
Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

Battery recycler Ascend Elements files for bankruptcy

April 13, 2026
Wolframite ore, the primary ore of tungsten from Altai, Russia

Tungsten scrap export controls draw industry attention

April 9, 2026

WM opens new $60m MRF in Indy

April 10, 2026
Industry group: Help us find the plastic bale volumes we need

PET bales sink further as other grades firm 

April 15, 2026

GFL acquires SECURE Waste for $6.4bn

April 13, 2026
Colorado regulators suggest mid-range EPR scenario

Why collaboration on plastic waste still matters

April 13, 2026
Solarcycle starts up Georgia recycling plant

S3399 signals a shift in how states are tackling solar panel waste

April 6, 2026

Amazon, DOE partner on critical materials recovery

April 13, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.