Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

West Virginia allows landfilling of CRTs

Bobby ElliottbyBobby Elliott
March 17, 2016
in E-Scrap
CRT

West Virginia has repealed a ban on the landfilling of televisions and other devices.

The state’s landfill ban on select electronics had been in place since Jan. 1, 2011. But House Bill 4540, signed into law March 10, amends wording in that legislation to remove the prohibition. The law does allow communities to prohibit landfilling in their own areas if “cost-effective” recycling alternatives exist.

The legislation goes into effect July 1. It had passed in the House on Feb. 22 and the Senate on March 7. It covers televisions, computers and display devices.

According to James Young, the executive director of the Kanawha County Solid Waste Authority, the ban was well-intentioned but ultimately wasn’t sustainable.

“It put a lot of municipalities and solid waste authorities in a very difficult situation where you had to do it but you knew you couldn’t make money or even break even,” Young said in an interview.

Young said the Kanawha Solid Waste Authority, which includes the West Virginia capital of Charleston, stopped accepting electronics about a year-and-a-half ago due to the high costs of recycling CRT TVs and monitors and a lack of funding. He said the county wasn’t alone in struggling to keep up with the ban.

“I think there’s unanimous support among municipalities to back the bill,” he said.

Bob Bennett of the Greenbrier County Solid Waste Authority told E-Scrap News following the ban hasn’t always been easy.

“We’ve always found a way to get rid of them, but it’s a constant struggle,” Bennett said. “It’s been a real nightmare and then I wonder if all the TVs we have shipped out of here have actually been properly taken care of or if they’ve just ended up in a landfill in another state.”

Bennett said his operation incurred costs of about 16 cents per pound to send TVs out of state for recycling. He added that the prospect of landfilling CRT TVs and monitors “isn’t perfect, but it’s better than them sitting in a warehouse.”

Bennett noted his recycling center will continue to offer free electronics recycling services Monday through Friday to residents of the county.

Jeff Slack, the director of the state’s Region 8 Solid Waste Authority acknowledged some communities have faced high costs as a result of the ban, but he said it was still possible to efficiently handle covered material. Region 8 manages solid waste disposal in a five-county district and operates two transfer stations.

“My perspective is a little bit different, I guess,” Slack stated. “I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to find a way to capture and recycle CRTs in a way that doesn’t cost me a tremendous amount of money.”

Slack said the Region 8 authority bundles all collected electronics and can ship them downstream for recycling at no cost. In the event loads contain too many CRTs, he faces costs of anywhere from 19 to 22 cents per pound.

“As long as we can recycle any material, we’re going to do that,” Slack said.

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection proposed the legislation that repealed the ban. Kelley Gillenwater, a spokesperson for the agency, told E-Scrap News the landfill ban did not succeed in encouraging recycling.

“The reason the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection proposed this 2016 legislation is because the prohibition, which was added … to facilitate the recycling of covered electronic devices, actually had the opposite of the desired effect,” Gillenwater said. “Because landfills couldn’t accept these materials, waste haulers wouldn’t pick them up, so the result was that many residents would dump them over hillsides and into creeks.”

Tags: CRTsLegislation & Enforcement
TweetShare
Bobby Elliott

Bobby Elliott

Bobby Elliott worked with Resource Recycling, Inc. from 2013 to 2021.

Related Posts

From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

byPuneet Thadani
July 10, 2026

In this guest column, the founder of Ecolar Global says the growing use of recycled content without standardized documentation presents...

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

RIT researchers develop AI-based textile recycling system

CA expects first textile EPR deadline

byStefanie Valentic
June 30, 2026

California's first textile EPR registration deadline arrives July 1 amid lawsuits challenging the nonprofit status of Landbell USA, the selected...

Load More
Next Post

Future uncertain for e-scrap kiosk business

More Posts

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

July 7, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

July 6, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

July 6, 2026
SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

July 7, 2026
EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

July 6, 2026
MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

July 3, 2026
Auto Draft

Digital product passports offer gateway into secondary market

July 7, 2026
Canada EV battery reuse pilot to start

Canada EV battery reuse pilot to start

July 8, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.