Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

    Canada Plastics Pact reports 2024 progress

    Trade tensions shift global mineral partnerships 

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    E-scrap magnet recycling company scales up

    Why only some rare-earth sources are economically viable

    e-Stewards to develop an ITAD-specific standard

    Certification scorecard — week of Sept. 21

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

    Canada Plastics Pact reports 2024 progress

    Trade tensions shift global mineral partnerships 

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Coca-Cola and others report using more recycled plastic

byJared Paben
December 7, 2021
in Recycling
Unilever reported a 6-percentage-point increase in its post-consumer resin usage in 2020, outpacing most other large brand owners. | Konektus Photo/Shutterstock

Global packaged goods companies disclosed their post-consumer resin usage for 2020, and most of the biggies reported purchasing more recycled plastic than the year before.

Coca-Cola Co. had 11.5% post-consumer resin (PCR) across its packaging portfolio, PepsiCo 5%, Keurig Dr Pepper 2%, Danone 10.3%, and Unilever 11%. Those were all up from 2019, except for Danone, which reported a slight decrease.

The data was unveiled by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation as part of its Global Commitment 2021 Progress Report, which includes details on the recyclability of companies’ packaging, use of PCR, efforts to eliminate problematic materials, adoption of reusable packaging, and more. The companies reporting data have all signed on to a number of Global Commitment goals. This is the third year the Ellen MacArthur Foundation has reported their progress. 

In terms of PCR usage, because the consumer goods companies are such huge users of plastic, even small percentage increases in PCR translate to a lot of recycled plastic. For example, The Coca-Cola Co. sold 2.96 million metric tons of plastic packaging in 2020, and at 11.5% PCR content, that comes out to roughly 341,000 metric tons of PCR. 

The year before, the company sold 2.98 million metric tons of plastic packaging, 9.7% of which was PCR, or about 289,000 metric tons. The year-over-year difference: an additional 51,347 metric tons, or 113 million pounds, of PCR.

And PepsiCo used 2.35 million metric tons of plastic packaging in 2020, of which 5%, or roughly 118 million metric tons, was PCR. The year before, the Purchase, N.Y.-based company used 2.3 million metric tons of plastic packaging, of which 4%, or 92,000 metric tons, was PCR. The year-over-year difference was 25,500 metric tons, or 56 million pounds.

For the biggest companies, the percentage-point increases were fairly modest. Unilever, however, boosted its PCR percentage from 5% in 2019 to 11% in 2020, a substantial jump compared with others.  

Still, the data also shows that most of the companies remain far from their 2025 targets, which vary by company. That was also one takeaway when California state officials released PCR usage data earlier this fall for beverage companies selling their products in that state. 

The following are details on PCR usage by worldwide packaged goods companies, broken out by sector and organized from largest user of plastic packaging to smallest: 

Beverage companies

The Coca-Cola Company: 11.5% PCR in 2020, up 1.8 percentage points from 2019

PepsiCo: 5% PCR, up 1 pp

Keurig Dr Pepper: 2% PCR, up 1.6 pp

Molson Coors Brewing Company: 1.6% PCR, up from 0%

Diageo: 5.4% PCR, up 2.9 pp

Spadel: 5.5% PCR, down 1.7 pp

innocent drinks: 31% PCR, up 2.7 pp

Pernod Ricard: 13% PCR, up 6.4 pp

Cosmetics

L’Oréal: 15.8% in 2020, up 8.7 percentage points from 2019

NATURA COSMETICS: 15%, up 6 pp

L’OCCITANE en Provence: 21.4%, up 6.7 pp

Food and snacks

Clif Bar & Company: 0% in 2020, no change from 2019

Ferrara: 0% (no 2019 data provided)

Nestlé: 4.2%, up 2.2 pp

Danone: 10.3%, down 0.3 pp

Mondelez International: 0.3%, no change

Mars, Incorporated: 0%, no change

Ferrero: 3.5%, no change

FrieslandCampina Nederland: 1%, up 0.1 pp

Kellogg Company: 0.09%, down 0.41 pp

Driscoll’s: 66.6% (no 2019 data provided)

McCormick & Company Inc.: 2.49%, up from 0%

McCain Foods: 0% (no 2019 data provided)

SOVENA: 0.6% (no 2019 data provided)

Zespri Group Limited: 11%, up 10 pp

Household and personal care

Werner & Mertz: 53.9% in 2020, up 1.9 percentage points from 2019

Freudenberg Home and Cleaning Solutions (FHCS): 0% (no 2019 data provided)

Unilever: 11%, up 6 pp

Henkel AG & Co.: 12%, up 3.5 pp

Colgate-Palmolive Company: 10%, up 3 pp

RB: 3.5%, up 0.5 pp

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Health: 1%, no change

The Clorox Company: 11%, no change

SC Johnson: 18.8%, up 3.07 pp

Beiersdorf: 1%, up from 0%

Essity AB: 2%, up from 0%

The report also goes beyond brand owners to include others in the plastic packaging value chain, including plastic producers. Among the plastics manufacturers that signed on to the commitment, those whose offerings included the largest percentages of PCR were China-headquartered Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co. (7.17% PCR), Spain-based Plasticos Compuestos (6.1%), Thailand-based Indorama Ventures (6%), Spain-headquartered NOVAPET (3%) and Austria-based Borealis (1.9%).

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation detailed some of its own takeaways from the massive 2020 dataset. Combing through the information leads the foundation to believe that global virgin plastic use appears to have peaked and is set to fall between now and 2025. The foundation also said progress has been driven by recycling, but “much more focus is urgently needed on eliminating single-use packaging.”

That was a point also made by activist group Greenpeace, which called for a reduction in single-use plastic consumption in favor of reusable packaging. In a statement, Graham Forbes, Greenpeace’s Global Plastics Project leader, also took aim at PCR.

“It is time for the world’s largest brands to give up their dream of recycled content as a supposed fix to this crisis,” he said in a statement. “It makes no difference to a turtle in our oceans that ingests plastic whether it is ‘virgin’ or ‘recycled’ or ‘plant based.’ And by continuing to advance recycling as the solution, brands are giving license to the fossil fuel industry to produce more plastic.”

A version of this story appeared in Plastics Recycling Update on November 17.
 

Tags: Brand OwnersIndustry Groups
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

Analysis: Undersupply of PCR is ‘stifling’ brand goals

US lawmakers urge protection of domestic RPET

byAntoinette Smith
September 25, 2026

In a letter to the US Trade Representative, five representatives asked the USTR to consider trade remedies and support verification...

Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

byStefanie Valentic
September 25, 2026

NAW is challenging an Oregon judge's ruling in favor of the state's extended producer responsibility law.

APR reports success for 2026 recycling tours 

APR reports success for 2026 recycling tours 

byAntoinette Smith
September 23, 2026

In May, more than 2,500 visitors toured 41 facilities in the US and Mexico, during APR's second annual Recycling in...

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

byAntoinette Smith
September 23, 2026

The recent three-year extension for exemptions to the state's PCR mandates elicited frustration and confusion among recyclers.

Textile EPR and the definition of recycling

Textile Exchange reports progress in production

byPaul Lane
September 22, 2026

The organization said the industry has made some sustainability progress, but there’s much room for improvement.

Study assesses environmental cost of excess data storage

BAN paper says AI e-scrap estimates are low

byPaul Lane
September 17, 2026

The advocacy group said current estimates on the scrap resulting from data centers don’t account for the full picture of...

Load More
Next Post

Accelerating demand drives Sustana acquisition

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

Recyclers reeling from NJ PCR extension

September 23, 2026
Oregon state capitol building with state flag and blue sky.

NAW appeals Oregon EPR ruling

September 25, 2026
Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

September 17, 2026

Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

September 21, 2026
Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

Bin to Better gets students involved in reuse, recycling

September 24, 2026

SB 54 plan for cartons, film draws warning

September 15, 2026
US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

September 16, 2026
Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for September 2026

August 31, 2026
Bridge Green, Hartree partner on mineral processing deal

Bridge Green, Hartree partner on mineral processing deal

September 21, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.