Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    How critical mineral alliances aim to shape the future of e-scrap metals

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 18, 2026

    Aurubis: Thefts involved scrap sample manipulation

    Metals and electronics recyclers report growth

    Plastic packaging

    Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

    Recycler cites market pressure in short-term closure

    AI, data anxiety push enterprises to destroy working devices: report

    Before the Bin: America’s textile waste problem starts in your closet

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    How critical mineral alliances aim to shape the future of e-scrap metals

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 18, 2026

    Aurubis: Thefts involved scrap sample manipulation

    Metals and electronics recyclers report growth

    Plastic packaging

    Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

    Recycler cites market pressure in short-term closure

    AI, data anxiety push enterprises to destroy working devices: report

    Before the Bin: America’s textile waste problem starts in your closet

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Plastics

MacArthur Foundation: Coca-Cola and others boost PCR use

byJared Paben
November 17, 2021
in Plastics
Unilever reported a 6-percentage-point increase in its post-consumer resin usage in 2020, outpacing most other large brand owners. | Konektus Photo/Shutterstock

Global packaged goods companies disclosed their post-consumer resin usage for 2020, and most of the biggies reported purchasing more recycled plastic than the year before.

Coca-Cola Co. had 11.5% post-consumer resin (PCR) across its packaging portfolio, PepsiCo 5%, Keurig Dr Pepper 2%, Danone 10.3%, and Unilever 11%. Those were all up from 2019, except for Danone, which reported a slight decrease.

The data was unveiled by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation as part of its Global Commitment 2021 Progress Report, which includes details on the recyclability of companies’ packaging, use of PCR, efforts to eliminate problematic materials, adoption of reusable packaging, and more. The companies reporting data have all signed on to a number of Global Commitment goals. This is the third year the Ellen MacArthur Foundation has reported their progress. 

In terms of PCR usage, because the consumer goods companies are such huge users of plastic, even small percentage increases in PCR translate to a lot of recycled plastic. For example, The Coca-Cola Co. sold 2.96 million metric tons of plastic packaging in 2020, and at 11.5% PCR content, that comes out to roughly 341,000 metric tons of PCR. 

The year before, the company sold 2.98 million metric tons of plastic packaging, 9.7% of which was PCR, or about 289,000 metric tons. The year-over-year difference: an additional 51,347 metric tons, or 113 million pounds, of PCR.

And PepsiCo used 2.35 million metric tons of plastic packaging in 2020, of which 5%, or roughly 118 million metric tons, was PCR. The year before, the Purchase, N.Y.-based company used 2.3 million metric tons of plastic packaging, of which 4%, or 92,000 metric tons, was PCR. The year-over-year difference was 25,500 metric tons, or 56 million pounds.

For the biggest companies, the percentage-point increases were fairly modest. Unilever, however, boosted its PCR percentage from 5% in 2019 to 11% in 2020, a substantial jump compared with others.  

Still, the data also shows that most of the companies remain far from their 2025 targets, which vary by company. That was also one takeaway when California state officials released PCR usage data earlier this fall for beverage companies selling their products in that state. 

The following are details on PCR usage by worldwide packaged goods companies, broken out by sector and organized from largest user of plastic packaging to smallest: 

Beverage companies

The Coca-Cola Company: 11.5% PCR in 2020, up 1.8 percentage points from 2019

PepsiCo: 5% PCR, up 1 pp

Keurig Dr Pepper: 2% PCR, up 1.6 pp

Molson Coors Brewing Company: 1.6% PCR, up from 0%

Diageo: 5.4% PCR, up 2.9 pp

Spadel: 5.5% PCR, down 1.7 pp

innocent drinks: 31% PCR, up 2.7 pp

Pernod Ricard: 13% PCR, up 6.4 pp

Cosmetics

L’Oréal: 15.8% in 2020, up 8.7 percentage points from 2019

NATURA COSMETICS: 15%, up 6 pp

L’OCCITANE en Provence: 21.4%, up 6.7 pp

Food and snacks

Clif Bar & Company: 0% in 2020, no change from 2019

Ferrara: 0% (no 2019 data provided)

Nestlé: 4.2%, up 2.2 pp

Danone: 10.3%, down 0.3 pp

Mondelez International: 0.3%, no change

Mars, Incorporated: 0%, no change

Ferrero: 3.5%, no change

FrieslandCampina Nederland: 1%, up 0.1 pp

Kellogg Company: 0.09%, down 0.41 pp

Driscoll’s: 66.6% (no 2019 data provided)

McCormick & Company Inc.: 2.49%, up from 0%

McCain Foods: 0% (no 2019 data provided)

SOVENA: 0.6% (no 2019 data provided)

Zespri Group Limited: 11%, up 10 pp

Household and personal care

Werner & Mertz: 53.9% in 2020, up 1.9 percentage points from 2019

Freudenberg Home and Cleaning Solutions (FHCS): 0% (no 2019 data provided)

Unilever: 11%, up 6 pp

Henkel AG & Co.: 12%, up 3.5 pp

Colgate-Palmolive Company: 10%, up 3 pp

RB: 3.5%, up 0.5 pp

Johnson & Johnson Consumer Health: 1%, no change

The Clorox Company: 11%, no change

SC Johnson: 18.8%, up 3.07 pp

Beiersdorf: 1%, up from 0%

Essity AB: 2%, up from 0%

The report also goes beyond brand owners to include others in the plastic packaging value chain, including plastic producers. Among the plastics manufacturers that signed on to the commitment, those whose offerings included the largest percentages of PCR were China-headquartered Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co. (7.17% PCR), Spain-based Plasticos Compuestos (6.1%), Thailand-based Indorama Ventures (6%), Spain-headquartered NOVAPET (3%) and Austria-based Borealis (1.9%).

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation detailed some of its own takeaways from the massive 2020 dataset. Combing through the information leads the foundation to believe that global virgin plastic use appears to have peaked and is set to fall between now and 2025. The foundation also said progress has been driven by recycling, but “much more focus is urgently needed on eliminating single-use packaging.”

That was a point also made by activist group Greenpeace, which called for a reduction in single-use plastic consumption in favor of reusable packaging. In a statement, Graham Forbes, Greenpeace’s Global Plastics Project leader, also took aim at PCR.

“It is time for the world’s largest brands to give up their dream of recycled content as a supposed fix to this crisis,” he said in a statement. “It makes no difference to a turtle in our oceans that ingests plastic whether it is ‘virgin’ or ‘recycled’ or ‘plant based.’ And by continuing to advance recycling as the solution, brands are giving license to the fossil fuel industry to produce more plastic.”
Starlinger

Tags: Brand OwnersIndustry Groups
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

EPR rules take shape in Oregon, as first test

Oregon OKs end-market verification from CAA

byStefanie Valentic
May 20, 2026

The state's Department of Environmental Quality has given the stamp of approval on CAA's Responsible End Markets program plan amendment.

Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

byAntoinette Smith
May 13, 2026

Amid numerous recent hits to the common packaging plastic, a stakeholder coalition is engaging with policy makers to encourage policy...

SWANA hires new executive director

APR, RecyClass wrap up third year of collaboration

byAntoinette Smith
May 12, 2026

The North American and EU organizations are working together to harmonize global recyclability standards.

APR, industry groups testify on overcapacity

APR, industry groups testify on overcapacity

byAntoinette Smith
May 8, 2026

Steve Alexander, CEO of APR, pointed to China as driving global oversupply despite fluctuating PET imports to the US and...

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

byStefanie Valentic
May 6, 2026

NRDC and Californians Against Waste are suing CalRecycle over finalized EPR regulations they say unlawfully allow chemical recycling and other...

Lithium-ion battery recycler to build New York facility

Why battery EPR doesn’t have a packaging problem

byStefanie Valentic
May 4, 2026

While packaging EPR fights injunctions, battery EPR has achieved a mostly harmonized legal framework across nearly every state that has...

Load More
Next Post

News from Argonne National Laboratory, TCL and more

More Posts

Bottle bill backers see opportunity for action

PET collapse exposes gaps in US recycling infrastructure

May 15, 2026
Niagara acquires rPlanet Earth assets in California

Niagara acquires rPlanet Earth assets in California

May 15, 2026
Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

May 20, 2026
Plastic packaging

Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

May 19, 2026
Extruder pushes out natural HDPE pellets at KW Plastics in Troy, Alabama.

Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

May 13, 2026
NJ e-scrap legislation

NJ qualifies PureCycle PP for minimum PCR law

May 14, 2026

Before the Bin: America’s textile waste problem starts in your closet

May 19, 2026
Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

May 13, 2026
Retail aisle with paper and plastic packaging.

Loblaw’s recyclability push could reshape packaging design across North America

May 14, 2026
Federal PACK Act aims to preempt ‘patchwork’ of state laws

House advances Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act

May 21, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.