Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Connecticut boosts prices it pays to e-scrap firms

byJared Paben
August 13, 2020
in E-Scrap
Computer towers collected and stacked for recycling.
Under Connecticut’s extended producer responsibility program, municipalities perform the bulk of e-scrap collections. | Suzanne-B/Shutterstock

Processing companies said multiple factors led them to raise recycling prices in Connecticut this year. Some cost pressures are unique to the state but others are being felt industry wide.

On July 2, the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP), which administers the state e-scrap program, announced the new recycling prices charged by the four processors permitted by the state program: Ecovanta, ERI, Newtech Recycling and Take 2.

Ecovanta will charge 37.5 cents per pound of material (up from 36.5 cents last year), ERI will charge 39 cents per pound (up from 37.5 cents), Newtech will charge 40.5 cents per pound (up from 39.5 cents), and Take 2 will charge 40 cents per pound (up from 38 cents).

Those prices are in effect for e-scrap collected from July 2020 through June 2021.

Connecticut’s extended producer responsibility (EPR) program covers TVs, monitors, computers and printers. During the 2019 calendar year, Take 2 recycled 6,082,590 pounds of covered e-scrap, Newtech recycled 2,980,990 pounds, ERI recycled 369,820 and Ecovanta recycled 20,537 pounds, according to DEEP.

Under the program, municipalities perform the bulk of e-scrap collections. The DEEP-approved processors then pick up, sort and recycle the material. The processors are allowed to bill OEMs mandated to fund the program for the recycling, charging them a rate approved by DEEP. Alternatively, OEMs can request that processors set aside their brands for recycling by the vendor of their choice; in that case, the processors charge a “separation fee” to cover their collection, sorting and storage costs.

For separation fees over the next year, Ecovanta will charge 29 cents per pound (up from 28 cents last year), ERI will charge 30 cents per pound (flat year over year), Newtech will charge 34.5 cents per pound (up from 33 cents), and Take 2 will 32 cents per pound (up from 31 cents).

Processors submit annual applications to DEEP that include their proposed prices.

Mark Latham, who manages the program at DEEP, noted the applications are a competitive process, and if a price exceeds one standard deviation from the average of all others, then that processor can be eliminated from the program.

He said this year’s rate increases are roughly in line with what the state has seen in previous years, but it’s the first time they’ve hit the 40-cent-per-pound mark.

Factors driving the pricing

The processor applications submitted to DEEP provide insight into some of the factors that go into their prices. Those details are not public under many other state programs.

If the prices are higher than they charge under any other contract or agreement, DEEP asks them to explain why. In this year’s explanations, ERI and Newtech cited a number of reasons, some unique to Connecticut and some not (Ecovanta wrote “n/a” and Take 2 left the space blank).

ERI, which recycles Connecticut electronics at its Holliston, Mass. facility, said heavy CRT volumes, brand sorting and municipal requirements went into this year’s price.

ERI representatives wrote that over the last several years, the company has received a large percentage of CRT display devices through the Connecticut program. The company noted the material it received through the program fell into the following categories and percentages of total weight processed by the firm: CRT TVs (71%), DLP TVs (7%), flat-panel TVs (7%), printers (7%), CPUs (5%), LCD monitors (1%), CRT monitors (1%), laptops (less than 1%) and plasma TVs (less than 1%).

“The heavy percentage of CRTs received from CT municipalities is reflected in our pricing proposal to ensure the [price per pound] is sufficient to cover the costs of properly handling the CRT glass, which ERI sends for glass-to-glass manufacturing,” according to ERI.

Additionally, the brand sorting and unit count requirements under the Connecticut program drive up labor costs. No other client requires ERI to sort material by brand, the application noted.

“This process is time and labor intensive and the increase in costs over standard processing is reflected in our pricing proposal,” the document states.

The company also said it experiences higher collection costs under the state program. Many municipalities don’t have space to store large volumes of e-scrap, so ERI must rent trailers or containers to store them, in addition to providing local governments the gaylords and pallets they need.

Newtech recycles Connecticut electronics at its Somerset, N.J. plant. In its application, Newtech cited three primary factors driving its price this year: ongoing weakness in the commodity market, increasing labor costs, and a shifting collection network.

The document elaborates on the last point, noting that during the past year, a greater percentage of collection points served by Newtech were low-volume and remote sites.

“There is simply a higher cost of business to service these towns,” according to the application.
 

Tags: EPRMarketsProcessors
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

byAntoinette Smith
July 7, 2026

While the state extended the incentive program, the status of a separate bill with similar goals is uncertain.

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

RIT researchers develop AI-based textile recycling system

CA expects first textile EPR deadline

byStefanie Valentic
June 30, 2026

California's first textile EPR registration deadline arrives July 1 amid lawsuits challenging the nonprofit status of Landbell USA, the selected...

Load More
Next Post
Mobile devices for e-scrap processing.

Processing research examines new recovery methods

More Posts

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

July 6, 2026
Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

July 7, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

July 6, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

July 6, 2026
SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

July 7, 2026
MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

July 3, 2026
ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

July 6, 2026
Auto Draft

Digital product passports offer gateway into secondary market

July 7, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.