Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Our top stories from June 2022

    e-Stewards adds RGX as enterprise partner

    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    How critical mineral alliances aim to shape the future of e-scrap metals

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 18, 2026

    Aurubis: Thefts involved scrap sample manipulation

    Metals and electronics recyclers report growth

    Plastic packaging

    Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

    Recycler cites market pressure in short-term closure

    AI, data anxiety push enterprises to destroy working devices: report

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Our top stories from June 2022

    e-Stewards adds RGX as enterprise partner

    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    How critical mineral alliances aim to shape the future of e-scrap metals

    Certification Scorecard — Week of May 18, 2026

    Aurubis: Thefts involved scrap sample manipulation

    Metals and electronics recyclers report growth

    Plastic packaging

    Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

    Recycler cites market pressure in short-term closure

    AI, data anxiety push enterprises to destroy working devices: report

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
      • All Topics
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Local government rep describes e-scrap funding problems

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
April 5, 2018
in E-Scrap
Maryland statehouse in Annapolis

Budget shortfalls are a reality for state programs nationwide, and in Maryland, the strain is increasingly being felt at the county level.

The Maryland Recycling Network (MRN) recently held a webinar that featured Kitty McIlroy, project analyst for the Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority (NWMDA), which manages electronics recycling contracts for a handful of Maryland jurisdictions.

She said that despite there being a state program in place, the specifics of the legislation do not do enough to ensure the full cost of electronics recycling is covered. That has put the onus on counties, which play an outsized role in Maryland’s local government system.

“There’s still 3.5 million tons of CRTs that will require management from 2015 to 2030,” McIlroy asserted, citing a figure from the National Center for Electronics Recycling. “That is a big deal for a lot of local jurisdictions, especially when it comes to their budgets.”

Maryland’s program

Maryland’s e-scrap program does not focus on convenience or performance standards, meaning it’s notably different from the initiatives in place in states such as Connecticut, Oregon, Vermont or Washington.

Under those systems, manufacturers manage and pay for the statewide collection network, and in some cases they are required to operate a minimum number of collection centers statewide to provide sufficient convenience when it comes to collection of the residential stream.

Maryland’s program, enacted in 2005, instead boils down to offering two options, manufacturer takeback networks and local government-run collection sites.

The program requires manufacturers of certain devices (computer or video display devices that contain a screen larger than four inches, measured diagonally) to register with the state’s environment department and pay a certain amount to the state. Manufacturers must pay a $5,000 or $10,000 registration fee each year, based on the number of devices they sell in the state.

The registration fees collected from manufacturers are used in part to fund grants that are available for municipalities and counties that offer collection options separate from the manufacturer takeback options.

OEMs can reduce their fee to just $500 if they offer residents free takeback for covered devices. These takeback programs must meet several criteria: They have to be free to Maryland customers, provide a free shipping container if one is requested, and include educational information about data destruction.

McIlroy contended that such an arrangement is not leading to an economically sustainable system.

She noted that in 2016, the state issued $250,000 in grants, with up to $15,000 available for an individual jurisdiction. But she said last year it cost nearly $800,000 for just four of the state’s counties to pay for their e-scrap collection programs.

“A $15,000 grant does not cover even one month of service for some (NWMDA) jurisdictions,” McIlroy said.

‘Not the most user-friendly process’

She added that when it comes to the manufacturer takeback option, there is a shortfall in resident awareness. Takeback program information is typically provided on the OEM’s website and the state website, but McIlroy said such details often don’t make it to the individuals that need them.

“At this point, it’s up to the Maryland resident to look up their electronics manufacturer’s brand information, and then figure out if they’re covered or not by calling or searching online,” McIlroy explained.

There are only a handful of free drop-off sites run by manufacturer takeback programs in the state. Most of the OEM programs use mail-in collection, even for larger, bulky items such as TVs. The mail-in service requires the resident to wait for packing materials to be shipped to them and can be complicated when the resident wishes to send in multiple devices.

Overall, McIlroy said, the takeback system in Maryland “is not the most user-friendly process.”

This means most residents are moving their end-of-life material into the pipeline managed by local governments, leaving counties in a lurch. McIlroy said there are only six out of the state’s 23 counties that offer year-round free electronics recycling drop-off for residents. Those jurisdictions operate the sites with funds allocated through their local budget.

“The remaining jurisdictions are faced with either disposing of electronics, or asserting some sort of tipping fee for recycling,” McIlroy said.

Photo credit: Sean Pavone/Shutterstock

 

Tags: Local ProgramsPolicy Now

TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

EPR rules take shape in Oregon, as first test

Oregon OKs end-market verification from CAA

byStefanie Valentic
May 20, 2026

The state's Department of Environmental Quality has given the stamp of approval on CAA's Responsible End Markets program plan amendment.

Extruder pushes out natural HDPE pellets at KW Plastics in Troy, Alabama.

Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

byBrian Clark Howard
May 13, 2026

KW Plastics in Troy, Alabama is a leading recycler of PP and HDPE—here’s a glimpse behind the gates.

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

byStefanie Valentic
May 6, 2026

NRDC and Californians Against Waste are suing CalRecycle over finalized EPR regulations they say unlawfully allow chemical recycling and other...

CAA seeks comment on REM recycling standard

byStefanie Valentic
May 6, 2026

Circular Action Alliance is now accepting public comment for its draft Responsible End Markets certification standard.

Lithium-ion battery recycler to build New York facility

Why battery EPR doesn’t have a packaging problem

byStefanie Valentic
May 4, 2026

While packaging EPR fights injunctions, battery EPR has achieved a mostly harmonized legal framework across nearly every state that has...

Electronics are the fire risk battery EPR keeps missing

Electronics are the fire risk battery EPR keeps missing

byStefanie Valentic
May 4, 2026

Most battery EPR frameworks don't cover what's actually igniting in collection trucks.

Load More
Next Post
computers for recycling

SERI unveils list of R2 priorities for the immediate future

More Posts

Bottle bill backers see opportunity for action

PET collapse exposes gaps in US recycling infrastructure

May 15, 2026
Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

Revised CA budget includes $200m for recycling

May 20, 2026
Federal PACK Act aims to preempt ‘patchwork’ of state laws

House advances Recycling Infrastructure and Accessibility Act

May 21, 2026
Plastic packaging

Why SB 54 source reduction planning is becoming the industry’s most challenging EPR test

May 19, 2026
Niagara acquires rPlanet Earth assets in California

Niagara acquires rPlanet Earth assets in California

May 15, 2026

Before the Bin: America’s textile waste problem starts in your closet

May 19, 2026
Extruder pushes out natural HDPE pellets at KW Plastics in Troy, Alabama.

Rare look inside the world’s largest plastics recycler

May 13, 2026
Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

Industry descends on DC to fight for PET

May 13, 2026
Aurubis: Thefts involved scrap sample manipulation

Metals and electronics recyclers report growth

May 20, 2026
Recycler cites market pressure in short-term closure

AI, data anxiety push enterprises to destroy working devices: report

May 19, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.