Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification scorecard for week of Jan. 19, 2026

    From CES to the shredder: What 2026 PCs mean for ITAD

    Certification scorecard for week of Jan. 12, 2026

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18-30, 2025

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18, 2025

    Industry announcements for the week of Dec. 15

    Certification scorecard for December 10, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 8

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification scorecard for week of Jan. 19, 2026

    From CES to the shredder: What 2026 PCs mean for ITAD

    Certification scorecard for week of Jan. 12, 2026

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18-30, 2025

    Certification scorecard for Dec. 18, 2025

    Industry announcements for the week of Dec. 15

    Certification scorecard for December 10, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 8

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

The economic argument for expanding a deposit program

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
June 18, 2019
in Recycling

Experts say a deposit system for non-alcoholic beverage containers would complement a Canadian province’s curbside recycling system, by cutting costs and increasing the volume of material recycled each year.

Eunomia Research & Consulting on June 13 published its research into how an expanded deposit would mesh with the Blue Box curbside recycling program in Ontario.

The report, titled “Better Together,” was commissioned by the Reoop Platform, a network of various recycling stakeholders with a European focus.

Specifically, the report sought to examine whether some of the most cited concerns about deposit programs would come to fruition if more containers were brought into Ontario’s deposit return system, which currently includes alcoholic beverages.

“For decades, the most vocal opponents of deposit programs have cited the high cost of such programs,” wrote Clarissa Morawski, managing director of Reloop, in the introduction to the report. “Another common argument is that deposit systems will take the value out of curbside recycling systems and make them economically unsustainable.”

But the report found quite the opposite. The study estimates a deposit for non-alcoholic beverage containers would cost 34 million Canadian dollars ($25.4 million) per year to implement, but that doing so would generate a net $9 million savings for Ontario’s recycling system, provided the move is combined with the existing Blue Box curbside recycling program.

Specifically, the study says the deposit expansion would cut overall processing costs for recycling operators from $234 per metric ton to $201 per metric ton, and would increase Ontario’s packaging recycling rate from the current 65% to an estimated 74%.

The benefits would come from several key areas, according to the report. For instance, with less material coming through the curbside stream, the program could cut collection frequency, generating a cost savings. The deposit expansion would also bring in an additional 130,000 short tons of material and raise the capture rate for all beverages sold to 90%, according to the report.

The deposit expansion would also allow the curbside program to put resources toward targeting additional streams, as it “creates space for packaging material that is not currently being captured,” according to the report.

The research was published just after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced several aggressive strategies to reduce plastic waste and boost recycling.

Photo credit: Thiago Figueredo/Shutterstock

 

Tags: CanadaContainer DepositsEPRLocal Programs
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

New brand-led recycling group looks to work with Congress

New brand-led recycling group looks to work with Congress

byAntoinette Smith
January 20, 2026

Led by the Consumer Brands Association, the Recycling Leadership Council includes several recycling, packaging, manufacturing and consumer product groups.

EU contributes €6 million toward textile DRS pilot

byAntoinette Smith
January 16, 2026

The TexMat pilot project will test a deposit return system featuring automated textile collection bins to accompany the rollout of...

#PRC2026 Speaker Spotlight: Scott Saunders

byScott Snowden
January 7, 2026

Scott Saunders grew up in the Southeast and has spent most of his life in Alabama, building a career in...

EPA awards $58m for waste, recycling infrastructure

EPA awards $58m for waste, recycling infrastructure

byAntoinette Smith
January 5, 2026

The second round of funding under the Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling grant program awarded about $58 million to 17...

#PRC2026 Speaker Spotlight: Christine Yeager

#PRC2026 Speaker Spotlight: Christine Yeager

byScott Snowden
December 29, 2025

Christine Yeager blends CPG leadership with advocacy, bringing energy to EPR and recycling debates. A former Coca-Cola sustainability director, she...

Panel tracks shifts in e-scrap as policy, AI reshape

Panel tracks shifts in e-scrap as policy, AI reshape

byScott Snowden
December 22, 2025

Executives across the electronics recycling and ITAD sector said shifting device design, battery risk, regulatory pressure and rapid data center...

Load More
Next Post

Recycled material exports trend upward in April

More Posts

CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

CalRecycle withdraws proposed regs for SB 54

January 12, 2026
Haulers continue to see recycling revenue drops

GFL Environmental relocates HQ to Miami Beach

January 21, 2026

From CES to the shredder: What 2026 PCs mean for ITAD

January 15, 2026
California posts initial recycling rates

California posts initial recycling rates

January 9, 2026

Alpla decries ‘painful impact’ of recycling market pressures

January 19, 2026
Chinese processing group details goals for US visit

AMP lays out vision of next-generation, AI-driven MRFs

July 24, 2024

New Jersey passes bill on single-use service items

January 14, 2026

Emerald joins effort to boost film, flexibles recycling

January 15, 2026
New brand-led recycling group looks to work with Congress

New brand-led recycling group looks to work with Congress

January 20, 2026

Aduro reports losses, will pick site for demo plant by end Jan

January 16, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.