Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 24, 2026

    Top stories from July 2024

    ITAD global regulation and compliance this summer

    ESG

    Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 17, 2026

    Sorted: Country roads, take my recycling

    State program revamp proposal advances in Oregon

    Oregon EPR ruling looms: what legal experts think

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 24, 2026

    Top stories from July 2024

    ITAD global regulation and compliance this summer

    ESG

    Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 17, 2026

    Sorted: Country roads, take my recycling

    State program revamp proposal advances in Oregon

    Oregon EPR ruling looms: what legal experts think

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Texas capital tangled in textiles recycling dispute

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
February 7, 2017
in Recycling

An effort in Austin to collect clothes at the curb aims to bolster convenience for residents, but nonprofit groups say it does so at the expense of established social programs.

The city launched curbside textiles collection on Dec. 5, contracting with Ohio-based Simple Recycling for collection and processing of clothing and other textiles. Austin, a city of nearly 890,000 residents, represents the largest city yet to contract with the company. Simple Recycle provides its services in more than 50 other communities.

Austin’s goal is to divert much of the roughly 3,300 tons of textiles that are disposed in a landfill annually. The city has a roughly 42 percent diversion rate for those materials, according to the most recent figures, and its target is 75 percent by 2020.

Under Simple Recycling’s business model, the service is provided for free to the taxpayers. According to the city, the company will pay the city $20 per ton for collected material, sell the collected items and keep the remaining profits. The material is collected on the same day and week as customers’ regular curbside recycling collection. Simple Recycling trucks pick up the material and take it to a warehouse for sorting.

According to a January memo from the city manager to the Austin City Council, after the launch, members of the nonprofit and reuse business community “voiced concern that the service might negatively impact donations to their organizations” and asked that the service be ended.

The city can cancel its three-year contract with the company without cause, but if it does, Austin can’t begin a similar program for three years. Public funds might also be on the line to reimburse Simple Recycling for start-up costs, terminated contracts and personnel expenses.

Drop in donations

The city council met last week to make a decision. Austin Resource Recovery, the city’s solid waste department, recommended the contract be allowed to continue, given the downsides of termination. The council voted to allow the contract to continue, but also to have the city manager look into options for amending the contract and to report back within six months with more information. In the meantime, the city plans to initiate a program that encourages households to donate usable items to local nonprofit organizations.

Representatives of numerous nonprofit organizations urged the council to cancel the contract immediately. They explained that not only do they already reduce textile waste through accepting donations, but the new program reduces revenue that funds the social services they provide.

“We are taking textiles, the very things that go in those (Simple Recycling) green bags, and turning them into changed lives,” said Jan Gunter of the Salvation Army.

The nonprofit groups said Simple Recycling doesn’t accept anything that non-profit thrift stores can’t accept.

“So it’s really a matter of convenience for folks, and whether that convenience is getting more things to the landfill,” Alison Alter, a city council member, said at the meeting.

Targeting waste, not donations

Simple Recycling founder Adam Winfield told the council he supports the nonprofits and that the company’s goal is to take textiles out of the waste stream, not out of the donation stream.

“I agree that if all that material was going to those organizations there would be no place for us, but it’s not,” he said. “It’s going in the trash can and ending up in the landfill, and offering a convenient alternative to throwing it in the landfill as a last resort is why we exist.”

He added that the Austin response is the first time there has been such an outcry over his company’s presence.

 

Tomra MRP

Tags: CollectionLocal ProgramsPolicy Now
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Marine debris-Molishka-Shutterstock

Bottles most-recovered waste in coastal cleanup

byPaul Lane
August 26, 2026

The Ocean Conservancy's 2025 report saw bottles overtake cigarette butts as the most-removed material from global waterways.

ABTC expansion drives triple-digit revenue gains

California battery EPR bill heads to Senate for final vote

byStefanie Valentic
August 25, 2026

Producers would lose an exemption that's shielded heavier batteries from California's stewardship rules since 2022.

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

NAW-backed coalition seeks SB 54 injunction

byStefanie Valentic
August 21, 2026

NAW says SB 54's 2032 recyclability mandate leans on the same standard a federal judge already froze in the SB...

The Maine state capitol building.

No bidders respond to Maine’s EPR RFP

byStefanie Valentic
August 20, 2026

Following CAA's announcement that it would not submit a bid for Maine's EPR program, the state's DEP announced that no...

The Maine state capitol in Augusta.

Circular Action Alliance won’t bid on Maine’s PRO contract

byStefanie Valentic
August 19, 2026

Circular Action Alliance announced it will not submit an RFP to implement Maine's EPR packaging program.

Landfill seen from above with equipment moving materials.

PFAS, EPR reshape waste and recycling policy

byStefanie Valentic
August 19, 2026

David Biderman, industry veteran and consultant, provided a regulatory update to attendees at WR Expo.

Load More
Next Post

Markets improve again for residential recyclables

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
The Maine state capitol building.

No bidders respond to Maine’s EPR RFP

August 20, 2026
Company debuts battery-containing device shredder

New battery shredding system debuts stateside

August 20, 2026
The Maine state capitol in Augusta.

Circular Action Alliance won’t bid on Maine’s PRO contract

August 19, 2026
WM CEO Jim Fish to retire in string of leadership changes

WM CEO Jim Fish to retire in string of leadership changes

August 26, 2026

Bob’s Red Mill meets 92% waste diversion rate

August 26, 2026
Hefty ending Orange Bag program

Hefty ending Orange Bag program

August 25, 2026
Canada seeks recycled-content mandates feedback

Building demand for recycled flexibles

August 25, 2026
ESG

Foreign equity is moving into North America’s e-scrap origination

August 19, 2026
Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

NAW-backed coalition seeks SB 54 injunction

August 21, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.