Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

    Canada Plastics Pact reports 2024 progress

    Trade tensions shift global mineral partnerships 

    Spin-off lets Linca focus on battery mineral recovery

    Critical mineral policy shift creates opportunity

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Inside the Circle: Put AI to work for the people who do the work

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Who should pay for lithium-ion battery fire damage?

    America’s critical-materials buildout has a feedstock problem

    Certification scorecard – week of Sept. 14

    Canada Plastics Pact reports 2024 progress

    Trade tensions shift global mineral partnerships 

    Spin-off lets Linca focus on battery mineral recovery

    Critical mineral policy shift creates opportunity

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Inside the Circle: Put AI to work for the people who do the work

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Texas capital tangled in textiles recycling dispute

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
February 7, 2017
in Recycling

An effort in Austin to collect clothes at the curb aims to bolster convenience for residents, but nonprofit groups say it does so at the expense of established social programs.

The city launched curbside textiles collection on Dec. 5, contracting with Ohio-based Simple Recycling for collection and processing of clothing and other textiles. Austin, a city of nearly 890,000 residents, represents the largest city yet to contract with the company. Simple Recycle provides its services in more than 50 other communities.

Austin’s goal is to divert much of the roughly 3,300 tons of textiles that are disposed in a landfill annually. The city has a roughly 42 percent diversion rate for those materials, according to the most recent figures, and its target is 75 percent by 2020.

Under Simple Recycling’s business model, the service is provided for free to the taxpayers. According to the city, the company will pay the city $20 per ton for collected material, sell the collected items and keep the remaining profits. The material is collected on the same day and week as customers’ regular curbside recycling collection. Simple Recycling trucks pick up the material and take it to a warehouse for sorting.

According to a January memo from the city manager to the Austin City Council, after the launch, members of the nonprofit and reuse business community “voiced concern that the service might negatively impact donations to their organizations” and asked that the service be ended.

The city can cancel its three-year contract with the company without cause, but if it does, Austin can’t begin a similar program for three years. Public funds might also be on the line to reimburse Simple Recycling for start-up costs, terminated contracts and personnel expenses.

Drop in donations

The city council met last week to make a decision. Austin Resource Recovery, the city’s solid waste department, recommended the contract be allowed to continue, given the downsides of termination. The council voted to allow the contract to continue, but also to have the city manager look into options for amending the contract and to report back within six months with more information. In the meantime, the city plans to initiate a program that encourages households to donate usable items to local nonprofit organizations.

Representatives of numerous nonprofit organizations urged the council to cancel the contract immediately. They explained that not only do they already reduce textile waste through accepting donations, but the new program reduces revenue that funds the social services they provide.

“We are taking textiles, the very things that go in those (Simple Recycling) green bags, and turning them into changed lives,” said Jan Gunter of the Salvation Army.

The nonprofit groups said Simple Recycling doesn’t accept anything that non-profit thrift stores can’t accept.

“So it’s really a matter of convenience for folks, and whether that convenience is getting more things to the landfill,” Alison Alter, a city council member, said at the meeting.

Targeting waste, not donations

Simple Recycling founder Adam Winfield told the council he supports the nonprofits and that the company’s goal is to take textiles out of the waste stream, not out of the donation stream.

“I agree that if all that material was going to those organizations there would be no place for us, but it’s not,” he said. “It’s going in the trash can and ending up in the landfill, and offering a convenient alternative to throwing it in the landfill as a last resort is why we exist.”

He added that the Austin response is the first time there has been such an outcry over his company’s presence.

 

Tomra MRP

Tags: CollectionLocal ProgramsPolicy Now
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

Colorado’s EPR programs move from planning to practice

byStefanie Valentic
September 17, 2026

Colorado's producer responsibility organizations move to implement the state's extended producer responsibility law.

Van filled with rolled carpeting for recycling or disposal.

California carpet recycling rate reaches 37%

byBrian Clark Howard
September 17, 2026

The state’s recycling rate rose for the sixth year in a row, despite challenging market conditions.

SB 54 plan for cartons, film draws warning

byStefanie Valentic
September 15, 2026

The new law's cartons and film targets could add 100,000 tons of plastic contamination to California's paper exports annually, a...

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaking at podium.

What’s on Newsom’s desk after the CA session end

byStefanie Valentic
September 14, 2026

With the California legislature adjourned, packaging, food-waste and EPR advocates are watching a single date, Sept. 30, to see which...

New Jersey pushes back PCR mandate to 2030

New Jersey pushes back PCR mandate to 2030

byAntoinette Smith
September 10, 2026

One of the highest-profile US laws affecting recyclers has been amended only four months before implementation, with the state citing...

Leadership at a pivotal moment

Leadership at a pivotal moment

byBrian Clark Howard
September 10, 2026

CalRecycle Director Zoe Heller is heading up an agency tasked with ambitious recycling and sustainability goals. Can she pull it...

Load More
Next Post

Markets improve again for residential recyclables

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

New Jersey pushes back PCR mandate to 2030

New Jersey pushes back PCR mandate to 2030

September 10, 2026

SB 54 plan for cartons, film draws warning

September 15, 2026
Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
Canada tariffs latest in new normal for RPET

Canada tariffs latest in new normal for RPET

September 11, 2026
Bale pricing mostly flat for September

Bale pricing mostly flat for September

September 9, 2026
Study assesses environmental cost of excess data storage

BAN paper says AI e-scrap estimates are low

September 17, 2026
Spin-off lets Linca focus on battery mineral recovery

Critical mineral policy shift creates opportunity

September 14, 2026
Additive cuts acetaldehyde migration in RPET bottles

PET roadmap pairs demand, CO2 footprint

September 15, 2026
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaking at podium.

What’s on Newsom’s desk after the CA session end

September 14, 2026
US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

US packaging is evolving. The recycling system isn’t ready

September 16, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.