Advertisement Header Ad
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard for December 3, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 1

    News from Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Precision E-Cycle

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Plastipak and more

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Sortera Technologies and more

    News from MKV Polymers, Metallium Ltd. and more

    Certification Scorecard for November 19, 2025

    News from American Beverage, Inteplast Group and more

    News from Action Carting Environmental Services, International Paper and more

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion

    Certification Scorecard for December 3, 2025

    Industry Announcements for Week of December 1

    News from Dynamic Lifecycle Innovations, Precision E-Cycle

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Plastipak and more

    News from Northeast Recycling Council, Sortera Technologies and more

    News from MKV Polymers, Metallium Ltd. and more

    Certification Scorecard for November 19, 2025

    News from American Beverage, Inteplast Group and more

    News from Action Carting Environmental Services, International Paper and more

  • Conferences
  • Publications

    Other Topics

    Textiles
    Organics
    Packaging
    Glass
    Brand Owners

    Metals
    Technology
    Research
    Markets
    Grant Watch

    All Topics

Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap News Magazine

Size reduction done right

byRafael Reveles
May 2, 2017
in E-Scrap News Magazine
Share on XLinkedin

This story originally appeared in the April 2017 issue of Resource Recycling. Subscribe today for access to all print content.

The choices available in the shredding equipment market are diverse and numerous. Most manufacturers now have a solution for virtually every application. Understanding the types of shredders available and criteria for evaluating the best choice is critical when purchasing one of the most expensive machines in a recycling plant.

It’s also imperative to see the effects different size reduction strategies can have on the actual material that will be processed. Many manufacturers are willing to facilitate a test as buyers perform their due diligence to ensure they make the best selection for their specific needs.

The shredder types highlighted here do not constitute a comprehensive list; they are just the most common ones used in materials recovery today. Likewise, there is not one “correct” way to shred. Selecting a shredder is a very business-specific choice and depends on a multitude of factors.

The goal of this article is to offer an in-depth look at the shredding landscape so that operators will know the details on how this recycling technology is adapting to the market.

What speed do you need?

There are a multitude of shredders available, but they generally fall into two categories: slow- or high-speed machines. High-speed models cut or fractionate faster due to the higher RPM of their rotors or shafts, and this generally leads to higher heat generated by more friction as well as higher dust generation. They are often the right machines when heavy items need to be broken apart or when particle sizes need to be small.

Slow-speed machines rely on high torque shear cutting and generally run cooler, produce fewer fines and are quieter. Whether slow or fast, the shredder chosen will need to have the right umbilical systems, including provisions for noise, dust, fire and maintenance, depending on what is being shredded.

For the high-speed machines, mills, whether hammer or ring type, are a key element in size reduction. This technology uses high speeds to spin rings or hammers that fractionate the scrap on impact until small enough to fall through a sizing grate.

Rings are a suitable choice when better liberation and fewer fines are desired. A ring’s internal diameter will be about 2.5 times larger than the diameter of the ring’s retaining shaft, which allows for deflection and rotation of the ring. In the case of hammers, multiple types are available, including chisel, notched, plain bars and many familiar profiles seen in the scrap industry. The hammers are especially useful in reducing heavy or hard-to-shred items.

The geometry of these mills adds to the shredding mechanism by means of the sweep of the hammers/rings. As the hammer passes the screen or grate, the distance between the two progressively gets closer to encourage more grinding action and further reduction. There are also some variations on mills where the rotors and shafts are vertical. On these machines, the material is ground against bars and textured wear plates as it falls toward the bottom of the mill. Some vertical machines have several stages of size-reduction implements, such as pre-breaker bars followed by rings below. Rather than a sizing screen, an adjustable orifice at the bottom of the mill’s tub controls the volume of the exit and the length of time the material recirculates inside the vessel.

Waste reducers tear and rip material against sizing bars or an opposing shaft.

Maintenance and wear can be higher for mills in certain cases, requiring owners to keep removable wear plates and surfaces in stock. These mills can be good candidates for applications involving hard drives, low-grade e-scrap, steel, appliances, motor stators, or a second or third finishing step. Mills are produced by many companies and are extremely diverse in size and configuration, making them easy to adapt to a specific application.

Granulators and reducers

Many operations use a type of shredder called a granulator. There are two main types of granulators on the market. They either accept whole scrap or are designed to be secondary and handle pre-shredded material.

These machines are high-speed and run at 125 to 250 RPM, depending on design. To be efficient, they rely on momentum and use solid, heavy rotors. Multiple blades affixed to the rotor shaft shear against stationary blades or anvils attached to the granulator frame. A sizing screen allows the material to recirculate until small enough to pass.

When working with granulators, maintaining the correct manufacturer’s specification on shear gap (distance between rotor blade and stationary blade interface) is a key aspect to enabling proper and efficient cutting. Most machines allow for a blade flip where the cutter can be unbolted and turned over to use an unworn face. Many anvils can be sharpened as they wear, making these machines very serviceable over time.

Some machines have a hydraulic ram and a large hopper that takes on whole scrap and pushes it into the rotor cutters horizontally. A PLC (programmable logic controller) monitors the demand on the drive motor and can modulate how much the ram feeds material into the cutting area.

Other machines are designed for smaller pieces, such as pre-shredded materials, and rely on gravity for feeding into the granulator chamber. Similar to mills, these machines offer high-quality liberation and throughput. They are challenged when dealing with steel and non-ferrous metals and shine when processing batches of plastics, circuit boards and cable. A common granulator application is wire chopping because the systems can produce an ideal particle size for separation of pure copper granulate.

Waste reducers, meanwhile, are slow-speed machines and use their uniquely designed pointed cutters to puncture, tear and rip material against sizing bars or an opposing shaft. The output sizes produced will be coarse and probably will need to be shredded again in a secondary shredding step.

Waste reducers exhibit a high tolerance to large ferrous parts and cut while in reverse, making them extremely productive. In addition, their use of horsepower can be frugal: A 200-horsepower machine can often process the equivalent to what a 400-horsepower shear shredder can offer. Waste reducers also grab material well and do not require any ram-feeding auxiliary measures. Some models are adjustable and the amount of cutters per shaft or spacing between the cutting bars can be changed in the field, making them adaptable to evolving applications or business conditions.

Machines that utilize ringmills use high speeds to efficiently liberate material with few fines.

Most systems produced are hydraulic drive and may even need to be constrained to make sure the downstream shredder is not overwhelmed. A simple algorithm can be programmed into the reducer’s PLC to pause the shafts and time their periodic reversal to essentially modulate the flow and balance downstream requirements.

Using a reducer as a pre-shredder can also allow operators to harvest clean scrap pieces such as plastic, steel or aluminum, and also remove large or heavy parts that could possibly jam the next shredder.

Shearing up

Shear-type shredders are slow-speed, high-torque machines that are fairly economical to operate.

The interlocking cutters are disk-like and have hooks integrated into the circumference. They size-reduce on the principal of shear cutting against cutters on the opposing rotating shaft that have an interference gap between one-hundredth of an inch to three-hundredths of an inch. They are offered in two-, three- or four-shaft models with either electric or hydraulic driven options. For units with more than two shafts, sizing screens are placed under the shredder cutters to produce a defined particle size.

For two-shaft models, cleaning fingers are used for stripping off the shredded materials from the cutter stack and preventing shaft deflection or damage. The two-shaft shredder models are lower cost but are limited to producing mostly a long strip cut, which is based on the width of the cutters. For those wishing to produce a tighter particle size, material can be conveyed to an external screener – oversized pieces can then be re-fed into the same shredder in circumstances where throughput does not need to be high.

Multi-shaft shredders deliver a defined particle size and reasonable throughput based on the screen opening size. Care must be used when choosing the cutter thickness and screen size since throughput can be reduced by excessive recirculation.

All the shredders mentioned thus far have their own ways of customizing based on application, but it’s particularly useful to know how to optimize shear shredders specifically.

The cutter is one of the most pivotal factors in shredder performance. The overall radius or diameter of the cutter directly affects the available cutting force since force equals torque divided by distance. Based on this simple physics equation, one can see that reducing distance, in this case the radius of the cutter, improves the amount of force developed. There is of course a limit to how much this trick can work, since the cutter size overall has to be large enough to geometrically grab whatever is being shredded.

It’s also useful to consider how the height of the hook plays a role in cutting ability – force, after all, is also proportional to surface area and pressure. A smaller surface area, as seen in a cutter with a shorter hook, will exhibit more pressure and that will enable better shearing.

Whatever cutter configuration is chosen, the quantities and patterns of cutters placed in the shredder chamber are significant. The total number of hooks engaging together at the same time will all equally draw on the available cutting force, so only having one hook engaging at a time is always going to be the strongest option. For higher throughput, more hooks need to engage at once and spiral or chevron patterns of the cutter hooks are often seen the offerings from most manufacturers.

Granulators rely on solid, heavy rotors like the one above. They generally handle pre-shredded material.

The cutter alloy is also a key variable and can influence operational costs due to cutter wear rates. Common cutter materials include D2 tool steel, 4140 heat treated and hardox variants such as 600. The brittleness of the cutter must be balanced with the difficulty of the materials being shredded to ensure there is no cutter cracking. If it is not possible to make a cutter change and the shredder does have a planetary or similar gearbox, the gear ratio can be changed to adjust the shredder shaft speed, with slower speeds yielding more torque.

In the driver’s seat

Another choice to make pertains to drive type. Most shredders feature either a hydraulic or electric drive, and both approaches have a role to play with their applications.

Hydraulic systems are mainly used for heavy-duty processing or situations requiring frequent reversal. Hydraulic-mechanical systems have a compound drive, in which a hydraulic motor turns a planetary gearbox to achieve a desired torque with a lower-cost motor. Some hydraulic pump systems allow the volume the pump displaces to be adjusted to control the speed of the shredder shafts, but others only allow for one fixed speed and are less expensive. Hydraulics are a proven technique, but this setup does require by-the-book maintenance to keep the machines running well to avoid replacement of expensive pumps prematurely.

Electric motor directly driven shredders are popular due to their efficiency and the fact they are simpler to maintain. A dry clutch or belt system is common to reduce gearbox damage caused by hard jams and reversals. The planetary gearbox, however, will require frequent oil changes and monitoring since that is the most likely failure point in these types of drives.

When using an electric drive, external options can allow for more shredder customization, such as a variable frequency drive (VFD). VFDs allow the motor and shredder speed to be decreased and adjusted on the fly by reducing the frequency of the power. They can also be used to speed up shafts, but they do lose motor torque once the motor frequency rises above the standard 60 hertz.

A close-up look at a four-shaft shear shredder that uses half-inch cutters.

Using the shredder’s drive motor amperage, a special controls routine can be developed to run a shredder at speeds above normal motor speed. The machine then slows down once more shredding amperage load is detected, ensuring peak torque is realized only when truly needed. Such a setup can drastically increase throughput for various types of materials.

The power of choice

Never have so many great choices in shredding equipment and customization been available to operators. This allows users to have a system in place to meet the exact needs of a facility.

Key performance choices include selecting the right cutter or hammer materials as well as identifying the optimal configuration, design, screen size and drive system. Using advances in drive systems to dynamically adjust the speed can be a game changer. Selecting a shredder style and platform that can be easily re-configured and adjusted for changing business needs is a good investment.

Step one in the search for a shredder should always be to arrange a test using your actual materials. And, of course, be sure to speak to several suppliers.

 

Part one of our series on shredding best practices appeared in the December 2016 edition of Resource Recycling and focused on critical concerns to ensure workers are properly protected when engaged in size-reduction activities. 

 

Rafael Reveles is an engineer and president of Converge Engineering (the recently launched engineering services business of Sims Recycling Solutions). He has 17 years of experience designing and building e-scrap processing systems and can be contacted at [email protected]. Find out more about Converge at convergeengineering.com.

Tags: Safety
Rafael Reveles

Rafael Reveles

Related Posts

Recycling facility fires increase substantially in 2024

byColin Staub
March 18, 2025

Publicly reported fires at MRFs and transfer stations increased by 20% in 2024 over the prior year, according to an...

MRF and collection worker deaths climbed in 2023

byColin Staub
January 7, 2025

Nine workers died in U.S. materials recovery facilities in 2023 and the death rate for refuse and recyclable material collectors...

Recycling facilities reported fewer fires in 2023

byColin Staub
March 19, 2024

An annual report from recycling industry fire protection firm Fire Rover found that publicly reported MRF and transfer station fires...

What comes after the slump

byJared Paben
June 4, 2017

This story originally appeared in the May 2017 issue of Resource Recycling. Subscribe today for access to all print content.  ...

Safety seminar sets sights on vehicle backing

byColin Staub
January 23, 2017

An industry training and awareness program focused on vehicle safety kicked off Monday, just weeks after a report showed that...

The safe way is the only way

byRafael Reveles
January 5, 2017

This story originally appeared in the December 2016 issue of Resource Recycling. Subscribe today for access to all print content....

Load More
Next Post

MRF of the Month: EBI Environnement

More Posts

Analysis: Q3 earnings confirm new industry priorities

Analysis: Q3 earnings confirm new industry priorities

November 13, 2025
Iron Mountain raises ITAD guidance on strong growth

Iron Mountain raises ITAD guidance on strong growth

November 13, 2025
ERCC outlines shift toward convenience benchmarks

ERCC outlines shift toward convenience benchmarks

November 13, 2025
Analysis: EU softens ESG rules as compliance pressure builds for US

Analysis: EU softens ESG rules as compliance pressure builds for US

November 20, 2025
Sector holds wide gaps in environmental standards

Sector holds wide gaps in environmental standards

November 20, 2025
From crawl to run: a clear roadmap for ITAD ESG

From crawl to run: a clear roadmap for ITAD ESG

November 20, 2025
New entrepreneurs bring renewed energy to e-cycling

New entrepreneurs bring renewed energy to e-cycling

November 20, 2025
The Re:Source Podcast Episode 1: E-Scrap look-back and 2026 outlook

The Re:Source Podcast Episode 1: E-Scrap look-back and 2026 outlook

November 21, 2025
ERI and ReElement partner on rare earth magnet recovery

ERI and ReElement partner on rare earth magnet recovery

November 26, 2025
Cyber risks confront ITAD work, contracts, coverage

Cyber risks confront ITAD work, contracts, coverage

November 26, 2025
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.