Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Partnership ups quality control on device-sales platform

    Certification scorecard — week of Oct. 19

    Industry veterans buy Entropex with plans to rebrand

    Lifecycle growth tested as metals diverge

    Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

    Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

    Researchers work on fluorine-free battery binder

    Researchers work on fluorine-free battery binder

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Blancco brings agentic AI to data erasure, ITAD operations

    APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

    Certification scorecard — week of Oct. 12

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    Partnership ups quality control on device-sales platform

    Certification scorecard — week of Oct. 19

    Industry veterans buy Entropex with plans to rebrand

    Lifecycle growth tested as metals diverge

    Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

    Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

    Researchers work on fluorine-free battery binder

    Researchers work on fluorine-free battery binder

    CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

    Blancco brings agentic AI to data erasure, ITAD operations

    APR adds PCR content verification to cert program

    Certification scorecard — week of Oct. 12

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home Recycling

Texas capital tangled in textiles recycling dispute

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
February 7, 2017
in Recycling

An effort in Austin to collect clothes at the curb aims to bolster convenience for residents, but nonprofit groups say it does so at the expense of established social programs.

The city launched curbside textiles collection on Dec. 5, contracting with Ohio-based Simple Recycling for collection and processing of clothing and other textiles. Austin, a city of nearly 890,000 residents, represents the largest city yet to contract with the company. Simple Recycle provides its services in more than 50 other communities.

Austin’s goal is to divert much of the roughly 3,300 tons of textiles that are disposed in a landfill annually. The city has a roughly 42 percent diversion rate for those materials, according to the most recent figures, and its target is 75 percent by 2020.

Under Simple Recycling’s business model, the service is provided for free to the taxpayers. According to the city, the company will pay the city $20 per ton for collected material, sell the collected items and keep the remaining profits. The material is collected on the same day and week as customers’ regular curbside recycling collection. Simple Recycling trucks pick up the material and take it to a warehouse for sorting.

According to a January memo from the city manager to the Austin City Council, after the launch, members of the nonprofit and reuse business community “voiced concern that the service might negatively impact donations to their organizations” and asked that the service be ended.

The city can cancel its three-year contract with the company without cause, but if it does, Austin can’t begin a similar program for three years. Public funds might also be on the line to reimburse Simple Recycling for start-up costs, terminated contracts and personnel expenses.

Drop in donations

The city council met last week to make a decision. Austin Resource Recovery, the city’s solid waste department, recommended the contract be allowed to continue, given the downsides of termination. The council voted to allow the contract to continue, but also to have the city manager look into options for amending the contract and to report back within six months with more information. In the meantime, the city plans to initiate a program that encourages households to donate usable items to local nonprofit organizations.

Representatives of numerous nonprofit organizations urged the council to cancel the contract immediately. They explained that not only do they already reduce textile waste through accepting donations, but the new program reduces revenue that funds the social services they provide.

“We are taking textiles, the very things that go in those (Simple Recycling) green bags, and turning them into changed lives,” said Jan Gunter of the Salvation Army.

The nonprofit groups said Simple Recycling doesn’t accept anything that non-profit thrift stores can’t accept.

“So it’s really a matter of convenience for folks, and whether that convenience is getting more things to the landfill,” Alison Alter, a city council member, said at the meeting.

Targeting waste, not donations

Simple Recycling founder Adam Winfield told the council he supports the nonprofits and that the company’s goal is to take textiles out of the waste stream, not out of the donation stream.

“I agree that if all that material was going to those organizations there would be no place for us, but it’s not,” he said. “It’s going in the trash can and ending up in the landfill, and offering a convenient alternative to throwing it in the landfill as a last resort is why we exist.”

He added that the Austin response is the first time there has been such an outcry over his company’s presence.

 

Tomra MRP

Tags: CollectionLocal ProgramsPolicy Now
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

Court gavel and justice scales on a table.

NAW asks to pause Oregon EPR fees

byStefanie Valentic
October 20, 2026

NAW is asking a federal court to pause Oregon’s packaging EPR law for its members until the Ninth Circuit rules,...

Republic breaks ground on St. Louis MRF

byStefanie Valentic
October 15, 2026

Republic Services’ new 45-ton-per-hour Bridgeton MRF is slated to open in 2028, as St. Louis is still deciding how its...

Fireside Chat at PRC features CAA chief

Fielkow to step down as CAA CEO

byStefanie Valentic
October 14, 2026

Chief Strategy Officer Jeff Meyers has been named interim CEO as CAA prepares for its transition.

‘Fast Tech’ reduction is focus of E-Waste Day

byPaul Lane
October 14, 2026

The initiative from the WEEE Forum looks to bring focus to the problems resulting from repeated use of quickly and...

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

CAA trims first-year SB 54 budget in final plan

byStefanie Valentic
October 13, 2026

The final plan sets a $1.1 billion budget for 2027, down from as much as $1.87 billion in June, and...

Removing an eBike battery pack.

EPR’s next fight is over embedded batteries

byStefanie Valentic
October 13, 2026

Eleven states have passed battery EPR laws since 2022, but Product Stewardship Institute staff told RCon attendees that most still...

Load More
Next Post

Markets improve again for residential recyclables

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

Lawsuits hover days after SB 54 approval

CAA trims first-year SB 54 budget in final plan

October 13, 2026

Republic breaks ground on St. Louis MRF

October 15, 2026
Northeast recycled commodity values hit 5-year lows

HDPE, PP prices climb for October

October 14, 2026
Court gavel and justice scales on a table.

NAW asks to pause Oregon EPR fees

October 20, 2026
Removing an eBike battery pack.

EPR’s next fight is over embedded batteries

October 13, 2026

Ingram Micro looks to digital platform and AI

October 14, 2026
CommanderAI launches searchable hauler database

Blancco brings agentic AI to data erasure, ITAD operations

October 15, 2026
Fireside Chat at PRC features CAA chief

Fielkow to step down as CAA CEO

October 14, 2026
Dow, Orbis talk EPR, demand at Pack Expo

Dow, Orbis talk EPR, demand at Pack Expo

October 21, 2026
Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

Sorted: Making Halloween costumes more sustainable

October 19, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazines

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletters

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazines
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.