Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    What the NAND flash crunch means for remarketing, refurbishment and residual values

    Telamon acquires ITAD consultancy Retire-IT

    Certification Scorecard — Week of July 6, 2026

    Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

    What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

    Amazon cutting out more flexible packaging

    Amazon’s AWS hardware reuse is measured

    MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

    ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

New York tightens e-scrap requirements for OEMs

byJared Paben
April 20, 2022
in E-Scrap
New York tightens e-scrap requirements for OEMs
New York State officials believe upcoming e-scrap program regulations may raise recycling program costs for electronics manufacturers. | Wolfilser/Shutterstock

The state of New York adopted regulations that officials say will improve e-scrap recycling opportunities and collection statewide, possibly at manufacturers’ expense.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) in February published the final regulations, which clarify and help implement the state’s 12-year-old extended producer responsibility (EPR) law. NYSDEC noted the regulations in a March 31 press release.

The regulations, which go into effect on Jan. 1, 2023, cover a number of facets of the state’s Electronic Equipment Recycling and Reuse Act. The act covers computers, computer peripherals and small electronic equipment.

State regulators say electronics manufacturers are not absorbing all costs of the collection and recycling program, as the law intended. As a result, costs for managing e-scrap are passed on to recyclers, municipalities and consumers.

Among the provisions, the new rules “strengthen the requirements for manufacturers’ responsibility for all costs associated with the implementation of their acceptance programs,” according to a summary document.

“The regulations clarify and strengthen requirements for the provision of a free and convenient acceptance program to consumers as originally intended by the Act, which may result in increased cost to manufacturers,” according to the summary. “Manufacturers and collectives will be required to enhance their acceptance programs in all the following areas: mail-back, convenience, public education and outreach.”

Specifically, when mail-back programs are not convenient for consumers or have weight or size restrictions, manufacturers will be required to offer an additional acceptance method, such as pick-up, a permanent collection site or collection events, according to the regulations impact summary.

Collectors and processors also affected

The regulations also affect other stakeholders, including e-scrap collectors and processors. For example, the regulations expand security requirements meant to avoid the vandalism or theft of devices at collection locations, and they require additional training for collection site personnel on how to handle potentially hazardous materials.

Additionally, processing facilities will be required to arrange a financial assurance to pay to clean up their facilities in the event the company fails and abandons a site, according to the rules. The costs of doing so are expected to vary considerably based on the size of the facility, throughput, type of processing and more.

“Facilities maintaining third-party certification may already have a closure plan in place and would incur no additional costs,” according to a financial impact estimate. “Those facilities without third-party certification will need to develop a closure plan, the costs for which will vary based on the scope of facility operations.”

NYSDEC held a public comment period last year on the draft regulations. Among the commenters were a number of OEMs, industry associations, municipalities and electronics recycling companies, including ERI, Sunnking and EWASTE+.
 

Tags: Policy Now
TweetShare
Jared Paben

Jared Paben

Related Posts

SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

byAntoinette Smith
July 7, 2026

While the state extended the incentive program, the status of a separate bill with similar goals is uncertain.

Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

byStefanie Valentic
July 7, 2026

A coalition of state agriculture stakeholders says the packaging law could add nearly $1,400 a year to household grocery costs...

In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

The National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors is fighting EPR in Oregon, and now in California too.

EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

CAA's Jeff Fielkow breaks down the organization's role in US packaging EPR and why being the only multi-state PRO in...

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

byStefanie Valentic
July 6, 2026

One year into Oregon's producer-funded recycling system, CAA provides an update on new carts, and the progress achieved.

RIT researchers develop AI-based textile recycling system

CA expects first textile EPR deadline

byStefanie Valentic
June 30, 2026

California's first textile EPR registration deadline arrives July 1 amid lawsuits challenging the nonprofit status of Landbell USA, the selected...

Load More
Next Post
Trade-in firm reports higher values for used phones

Trade-in firm reports higher values for used phones

More Posts

Oregon’s Recycling Modernization Act faces injunction

Oregon’s EPR program posts first-year results

July 6, 2026
Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

Unpacking the Starbucks cup data

July 8, 2026
Two recycled-content bills gain approval in California

California agriculture seeks SB 54 repeal

July 7, 2026
In Our Opinion: Coalitions: The EPR Differentiator

Inside NAW’s constitutional case against packaging EPR

July 6, 2026
EPR fees are a market signal. Here’s what they’re telling you.

Building the infrastructure behind EPR

July 6, 2026
MP Materials breaks ground on rare earth magnet campus in North Texas

ERI confirms ITAD shift toward minerals

July 3, 2026
SB 54 draft rules generate debate on rates, review

California increases PET market payments

July 7, 2026
ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

ITAD firm wins spot for NASA purchasing

July 6, 2026
Tech giant pens detailed ‘plastic-free packaging’ guide

What Google’s latest report means for ITAD

July 8, 2026
SCS launches chem recycling standard

SCS launches chem recycling standard

July 1, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.