Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    SERI works to restore faith in certifications

    Building a defensible E-scrap evidence file

    EU flags in front of the European Commission's building.

    Europe’s electronics recovery market is moving upstream

    Maximizing the value of post-consumer PP 

    Maximizing the value of post-consumer PP 

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 3, 2026

    Microsoft confirms PC sales slump

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for August 2026

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
    • All
    • Certification Scorecard
    • Industry Announcements
    • Opinion
    SERI works to restore faith in certifications

    Building a defensible E-scrap evidence file

    EU flags in front of the European Commission's building.

    Europe’s electronics recovery market is moving upstream

    Maximizing the value of post-consumer PP 

    Maximizing the value of post-consumer PP 

    From claims to custody: PCR procurement grows up

    Certification Scorecard — Week of August 3, 2026

    Microsoft confirms PC sales slump

    Industry announcements for January 2026

    Industry announcements for August 2026

  • Conferences
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • E-Scrap: The Longevity Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Publications
    • E-Scrap News
    • Plastics Recycling Update
    • Policy Now
    • Resource Recycling
    • Other Topics
      • All Topics
      • Brand Owners
      • Critical Minerals
      • Glass
      • Grant Watch / RFPs
      • Markets
      • Organics
      • Packaging
      • Research
      • Technology
      • Textiles
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Resource Recycling
No Result
View All Result
Home E-Scrap

Guilty pleas in Stone Castle CRT case

Colin StaubbyColin Staub
December 13, 2018
in E-Scrap
Court gavel and scales on table.

Two men accused of stockpiling and taking steps to illegally dispose of CRT glass have pleaded guilty to federal hazardous waste violations. One of them has been sentenced to probation.

Stone Castle Recycling CEO Anthony Stoddard and employee Jamen Wood were indicted on federal charges in July 2017, accused of improperly storing and disposing of hazardous waste and knowingly omitting material information on a manifest. The case is in U.S. District Court in the District of Utah, Northern Division.

In June 2018, Stoddard pleaded guilty to one count of knowingly storing hazardous waste without a permit, and Wood pleaded guilty to one count of knowingly omitting material information on a manifest. Other counts were dropped as part of the plea agreement with prosecutors.

Stone Castle Recycling, a Clearfield, Utah e-scrap collector that accepted CRTs and other material, began attracting the attention of state and federal regulators several years ago. The company and its facilities came under scrutiny for several reasons, including on-site fires and storage practices. The Basel Action Network (BAN) watchdog group later issued a report blasting Stone Castle for those issues and alleged it was involved with exporting e-scrap to Hong Kong.

In November, Wood was sentenced to four years of probation with no fines or restitution owed. Stoddard is scheduled to be sentenced on Jan. 28.

Stockpile draws regulatory interest

In early 2013, the U.S. EPA told Stoddard that tests of glass at his facility showed lead levels that classified it as hazardous waste. Shortly afterward, Wood told state regulators the company was “trying to get rid of its stockpiles of millions of pounds of CRT glass,” according to the indictment.

The company tried to negotiate a deal to send the glass to a non-hazardous waste landfill, but landfill representatives refused to take it. State regulators reiterated to Wood the glass was considered a hazardous waste.

In March 2013, Wood took a piece of panel glass and a piece of funnel glass and had them tested for lead to determine whether they constituted hazardous waste. He later told investigators he “did not know what he was doing when it came to testing,” according to a pre-sentencing recommendation from prosecutors, “and that he and Mr. Stoddard had ‘lots of different conversations’ that CRT glass was hazardous.”

The test results showed that the two pieces of glass were not hazardous, according to court documents. Prosecutors later attributed that to the small sample size and specific samples of glass submitted for testing.

Wood then contacted multiple other landfills, each of which declined to take the material because it was hazardous waste. Finally, he contacted Clean Harbors Grassy Mountain, a landfill that had both hazardous and non-hazardous waste storage capacity.

Although it could accept hazardous waste, after a landfill representative looked at the test results, the landfill agreed to accept CRT glass that was labeled as non-hazardous material, which required a far lower fee from the supplier. Wood sent 304,000 pounds of crushed CRT glass labeled “non-hazardous” in two shipments. Regulators learned what was going on and stopped a third shipment from being delivered to the landfill. They tested samples of the shipment and found it was hazardous, according to the pre-sentencing recommendation.

Stone Castle was barred from sending any more glass to Clean Harbors’ non-hazardous waste landfill. The landfill “had to take some remedial action” for the glass that had already been delivered, but the environmental impacts were “minimal,” according to court filings.

Regulators find significant tonnage

State inspectors visited Stone Castle three times during the summer of 2013. During the first visit, they observed 912 gaylords holding nearly 3.5 million pounds of CRT glass, stored inside and outside the warehouse. On the next visit, there were 1,411 gaylord boxes, and during their final visit, they found 1,458 boxes. Some were open and glass had spilled to the ground, the indictment states.

The Utah Department of Waste Management and Radiation Control issued Stoddard a violation of hazardous waste laws, ordering him to immediately move the boxes of glass indoors.

Stoddard said his business was working to meet the requirements to operate the facility in compliance with hazardous waste laws. The following year, Stone Castle vacated the facility “and abandoned the hundreds of boxes of CRT glass both inside and outside of the facility,” according to the indictment.

Sentencing considerations

In the sentencing documents for Wood, the U.S. Attorney’s Office recommended no prison time and a probation period of four years, even though the crime carried a potential range of one to seven months of incarceration.

They said the lower sentence was appropriate for a number of reasons, including that it was debatable whether there was an actual “victim” of his crime. The landfill could be considered negligent, they indicated, because it had an employee review “test results that were obviously substandard” and physically inspect the CRT glass that was being disposed of.

The attorneys also noted that Wood’s actions did not result in “catastrophic harm” and that the pressure of keeping his job needed to be taken into account.

Photo credit: Maren Winter/Shutterstock
 

Tags: CRTsLegalPolicy Now
TweetShare
Colin Staub

Colin Staub

Colin Staub was a reporter and associate editor at Resource Recycling until August 2025.

Related Posts

New federal rule restricts black mass, tungsten scrap exports

byStefanie Valentic
August 5, 2026

A new BIS rule requires US sellers of black mass and tungsten scrap to allocate 100% of monthly sales domestically...

Summing up California container deposit changes

Connecticut’s container redemption rate soars 27%

byStefanie Valentic
August 5, 2026

Connecticut's redemption rate jumped 27% in a year, while most other deposit states remained flat.

Plastic packaging samples arranged on a table.

What producers got wrong about SB 54’s 25% target

byStefanie Valentic
August 3, 2026

rePurpose Global's Alyssa Dizon says the most common mistake producers make is treating a collective reduction goal as an individual...

CAA opens series of Oregon EPR webinars

byStefanie Valentic
August 3, 2026

CAA is opening a formal consultation series to gather input from producers to regulators before the 2028-2032 blueprint locks in,...

2024 legislatures focus on batteries, state programs

NAW sues Colorado over EPR packaging law

byStefanie Valentic
July 30, 2026

NAW is taking its constitutional case against packaging EPR to Colorado, arguing the state's fee-setting delegation to CAA violates due...

California releases deposit system update draft rules

Groups move to intervene in SB 343 lawsuit

byStefanie Valentic
July 27, 2026

Earth Island Institute and Californians Against Waste have filed to intervene in the federal lawsuit that halted enforcement of California's...

Load More
Next Post
S3 company CEO and Chairman stand by a company truck.

Company leader talks business growth and road ahead

2026 Buyers’ Guide

Equipment, services and technology suppliers serving the recycling industry.

Browse the Guide

More Posts

New federal rule restricts black mass, tungsten scrap exports

August 5, 2026
The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

Oregon wash hub looks to slash single-use plastic

August 4, 2026
tires

The most important decision in tire recycling happens before the shredder

August 3, 2026
2024 legislatures focus on batteries, state programs

NAW sues Colorado over EPR packaging law

July 30, 2026

The first E-scrap franchisor finds treasure in trash

August 3, 2026
Data shows need for recycling label clarity

Data shows need for recycling label clarity

July 31, 2026
Plastic packaging samples arranged on a table.

What producers got wrong about SB 54’s 25% target

August 3, 2026
CarbonLite to open $60 million Pennsylvania plant

Federal judge blocks CA ‘Truth in Recycling’ (SB 343) law

July 15, 2026
Industry announcements for January 2026

Industry announcements for August 2026

August 3, 2026
Alpek closing Pennsylvania RPET plant

Alpek seizing on war-related opportunity 

July 27, 2026
Load More

About & Publications

About Us

Staff

Archive

Magazine

Work With Us

Advertise
Jobs
Contact
Terms and Privacy

Newsletter

Get the latest recycling news and analysis delivered to your inbox every week. Stay ahead on industry trends, policy updates, and insights from programs, processors, and innovators.

Subscribe

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • The Latest
  • Analysis
  • Recycling
  • E-Scrap
  • Plastics
  • Policy Now
  • Conferences
    • E-Scrap Conference
    • Plastics Recycling Conference
    • Resource Recycling Conference
    • Textiles Recovery Summit
  • Magazine
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Archive
  • Jobs
  • Staff
Subscribe
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.