‘There is no supply’

This article appeared in the May 2020 issue of Resource Recycling. Subscribe today for access to all print content.

 

Though container deposit systems only exist in a handful of U.S. states, the programs play a key role in the material pipeline for many recycling companies. That’s because bottle returns generate a very clean supply of product in three categories: aluminum, glass and PET plastic.

But since the coronavirus pandemic has hit the U.S., that reliable flow of quality recyclables has been quickly cut off.

Stay-at-home orders mean people are not heading out to bring back their bottles and cans, and eight out of the 10 states with container redemption systems have enacted temporary measures limiting deposit returns in some way.

The fallout for recycled material processors has been expansive.

“There is no supply,” said Tom Emmerich, chief operating officer at Schupan and Sons, the largest processor of deposit containers in Michigan.

With less material coming in, companies are shouldering higher costs and scrambling to supply their customers. In some cases, they’re curtailing operations temporarily.

“We’re learning how critical recycling is to the supply chain for packaging,” said Susan Collins, president of the Container Recycling Institute, “and how vulnerable it is to this kind of disruption.”

Requirements loosened for retailers

Collins’ organization, which advocates for container deposit programs, has compiled information about how deposit systems are changing due to the coronavirus. Most of the states that have made changes have relaxed take-back requirements for retail stores that sell beverages covered under the deposit systems, she said. Such temporary changes are being made to limit retailers’ staffing requirements and cut down on person-to-person interactions.

This is the case in Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon and Vermont. In Michigan, officials went a step further, specifically defining container redemption as non-essential.

These regulations have had different impacts around the country.

In Oregon, where the beverage distributor-managed Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative (OBRC) runs the state’s container redemption system, returns are down but have not vanished. Retailers have largely suspended acceptance of containers for redemption in line with the state’s emergency regulations, but OBRC operates a number of standalone redemption centers that have remained open with social distancing policies in place. People can continue to use those centers, called BottleDrops, to redeem deposits using reverse-vending machines. They can also fill a bag with containers and drop the full bag off at a redemption center – in that case, a user’s account is credited with the deposit amount once the containers are processed.

In the first week of April, OBRC’s returns were at about 45% of the total returned during the same time last year, said Jules Bailey, chief stewardship officer for OBRC.

Bailey noted that “everything is very volatile” and that returns could vary significantly from week to week. Bailey said there are less-populated areas of the state with no returns coming in at all because OBRC has no redemption centers sited in those regions. And even where redemption centers are available, more people are likely simply staying home due to the virus, he noted.

Redemption options have diminished significantly in Iowa, as well. The state suspended retail collection requirements. And even though some stores have continued to redeem containers, a statewide stay-at-home order contributed to a drop in returns.

“We’ve noticed that the redemption basically stopped at the time of the shelter in place order,” said Mick Barry of Mid-America Recycling, which handles deposit material and other recyclables in Des Moines, Iowa’s largest city.

Because Mid-America also processes the city’s curbside recycling, the company is well-positioned to gauge whether people are putting deposit containers in their curbside carts during this period when they may be hesitant to use retail return options. So far, the company has not seen a spike in curbside recycling of deposit containers, Barry said.

“People are storing,” Barry said. “That’s the impression we’re getting.”

As retail options diminished in Iowa, the state’s network of independent redemption centers has faced its own challenges. For instance, redemption center operator Can Shed first enacted social distancing policies at its walk-in locations and then closed its centers in Cedar Rapids and Iowa City altogether until further notice. Other independent centers are staying open but limiting their hours.

Returns stop suddenly

In Michigan, describing the situation as a “supply disruption” doesn’t quite cover the scope.

Under Michigan’s system, all container redemptions are done through retail locations. So when the state’s governor on March 24 ordered the public to suspend non-essential activities, that had an immediate impact on deposit volume.

“Although bottle return services are often located within grocery and convenience stores, they are not considered critical infrastructure,” state officials wrote in guidance on the order.

“Within two days, the supply stopped,” Emmerich of Schupan & Sons said.

He noted Schupan understands why the order was made and that the country is in unusual times. But he said he was concerned that residents may stockpile containers and wait until the retail redemption sites reopen, leading to a chaotic situation.

Starting the system up again in an organized way is going to be important. “Otherwise, you’re going to have complete chaos,” Emmerich said.

Collins of the Container Recycling Institute agreed. “The restart all needs to happen in a very thoughtful way,” she said.

The current situation is also problematic to product makers in the region, Emmerich said. Michigan deposit containers are very highly sought after for manufacturing because they’re some of the cleanest recycled feedstock around.

California volume drops off

For plastics recycling company CarbonLite, a major processor of recovered PET, the impact has been substantial, especially at the company’s California operations.

In normal times, CarbonLite’s Riverside, Calif. processing facility uses exclusively PET recovered through California’s container deposit system. But in recent weeks, that stream has been hit hard. Restrictions on public gatherings and a move to suspend requirements that retailers redeem containers have reduced availability of deposit bales markedly.

Leon Farahnik, CEO of CarbonLite, said his company is instead bringing in curbside PET bales, sometimes being forced to truck them in from neighboring states. About 60% of the operation’s feedstock now comes from curbside sources.

“We have no choice,” Farahnik said. “We have to combine curbside and deposit bales, if it’s available.”

In the past, CarbonLite had “ample material” from the deposit stream. The California program generates a total PET volume of up to 600 million pounds per year, Farahnik said. But the reduction in public activity from the coronavirus, along with recent substantial rainstorms, have added to supply problems that were already occurring in the state (in recent years, California has seen widespread redemption center closures).

The shift in feedstock has spurred substantial operational changes at the CarbonLite facility.

Curbside bales have much more contamination than those sourced through the deposit stream. That’s not a problem for CarbonLite’s facility in Dallas and its upcoming plant in Pennsylvania, where the equipment is prepared to handle curbside contamination levels. But in California, where the facility was built under the assumption of cleaner material, it’s a different story. CarbonLite has responded by bringing in additional manual sorters.

“Curbside bales have a lot more junk in them, so you have to have more people to collect junk out of the system,” Farahnik said.

The facility is considered essential under California regulations, so it is allowed to continue operating. The company is producing as much as it can under the current circumstances, Farahnik said, but he noted the impacts have been clear.

“It really affects our financial side,” Farahnik said. With additional labor expenses and reductions in bale yield due to the switch to curbside supply, the cost increase has been a “measurable amount,” he noted.

For now, CarbonLite, which supplies major beverage producers, will be absorbing those costs.

“You have to do what you have to do, because you don’t want to shut your plant down,” Farahnik said.

Glass shortage as demand surges

Meanwhile, on the glass side, processor Strategic Materials relies on deposit material because it’s clean and typically pretty consistent in quality, said Laura Hennemann, vice president of marketing and communications for Strategic.

In recent weeks, the coronavirus has quickly limited the amount of material Strategic brings in.

“We have seen a drop-off in deposit glass to the point where, in some of our facilities, we’ve had to curtail some of our operations just because we’re not getting enough feedstock,” Hennemann said.

For example, in a Strategic Materials facility in the Northeast U.S. that relies entirely on deposit glass, inbound supply is down by 60% to 80%, Hennemann said.

The impact for the company varies by region, because some of the company’s facilities are more dependent on deposit glass than others. But even facilities that use primarily MRF glass are getting hit, she noted. Although consumers are recycling more at home because of stay-at-home orders, restaurants, bars, casinos and other large glass-generating businesses have shuttered, leaving a void in that sector of collection.

Consumers are using more glass packaging products, which is “driving a huge demand,” Hennemann said. “But on the supply side, we’re not getting the volumes we need to continue to feed the demand.”

A similar problem is emerging in Iowa. Mid-America saw 60% of its inbound deposit glass disappear in the last couple weeks of March. That shortage, Barry said, is creating a supply problem for glass bottle manufacturers, who rely on the cullet produced by Mid-America’s glass beneficiation line.

Manufacturers hungry for material

Collins of CRI said the supply shortage is particularly problematic right now. Beverage container sales are up markedly as more residents are consuming drinks at home rather than at restaurants and bars.

“At exactly the time they need more material to make these beverage packages, the availability of the material is less, so that makes it even more disruptive,” Collins said.

Beverage packaging firms are largely designated as “essential” and are operational. Owens-Illinois, for example, recently reported operating at 85% to 90% of its production capacity. And demand for beverage packaging overall is up in the past few weeks.

Specific sales figures are not yet available. But according to Gary Hemphill of Beverage Marketing Corporation, which researches statistics on the industry, “beverages experienced a sales surge in March due to pantry-loading or what some others have called pantry-overloading.”

Bottled water has experienced a particular sales surge, Hemphill told Resource Recycling.

What the supply disruption means for manufacturers will become clearer in the weeks and months to come. Keeping up with the greater demand could mean using more virgin material temporarily if that is all that’s available.

Colin Staub is Resource Recycling’s senior reporter and can be contacted at colin@resource-recycling.com