Legislators in states across the country have recently introduced bills establishing extended producer responsibility for carpet.
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) describes the approach of requiring product manufacturers to manage and/or contribute funding to the collection and recycling of their products at end of life.
In the Midwest, the Minnesota legislature has three bills that create carpet stewardship program. On Feb. 8, HF 842 was introduced in the House of Representatives, SF 1171 was introduced in the Senate on Feb. 18, and HF 1426 was introduced in the House on Feb. 22.
Meanwhile, in Illinois, SB0345 was introduced in the Senate on , Feb. 19.
On the East Coast, S05027 was introduced in the New York State Senate on Feb. 22.
On the West Coast, in Oregon, HB 3271 was introduced in the House of Representatives on Feb. 23. None of the bills has yet emerged from legislative committees.
Scott Cassel, founder and CEO of the Product Stewardship Institute, said he believes each of the bills, which take slightly different approaches to carpet EPR, has an equal chance of passing. The bills in Illinois and Minnesota have been introduced in their legislatures for years, followed by New York and then Oregon, he said.
California is the only state that has an EPR law for carpet. The material is one of many items under discussion by the Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling. In December, the commission released a list of preliminary recommendations for state lawmakers, including changes to the Golden State’s carpet program.
Carpets are made with various polymers, including polyester, PP and nylons, but collecting and recycling the durable textiles poses unique challenges. Using industry data, the U.S. EPA estimates 3.37 million tons of carpet and rugs were generated in the U.S. waste stream in 2018. Of that, about 9% was recycled, 18% burned for energy recovery, and the remaining 73% was landfilled.
More stories about EPR/stewardship
- Only US carpet EPR program reports 28% recycling rate
- In My Opinion: EPR needed for flexible packaging
- State legislators explain why they’re drawn to EPR